On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:04:10PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I just did that in commit a9424c0 (already pushed). I think it does
> the right thing, but if it doesn’t, let’s discuss it. :-)
It works well for me, and the patch fixing the size of the graph is also
a nice addition. Thanks!
An
Andreas Enge skribis:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:21:47AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Hmm, there was no Makefile in doc/, so how could “cd doc; make pdf” work?
>
> Sorry, indeed, it did not work of course. "make doc/guix.pdf".
>
>> With that, “make pdf” at the top level creates doc/guix.pdf
Andreas Enge skribis:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:09:40PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Please don’t do that: the build system purposefully avoids recursive
>> makefiles, to improve parallelism etc. (see
>> <http://miller.emu.id.au/pmiller/books/rmch/>.)
>
>
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:21:47AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hmm, there was no Makefile in doc/, so how could “cd doc; make pdf” work?
Sorry, indeed, it did not work of course. "make doc/guix.pdf".
> With that, “make pdf” at the top level creates doc/guix.pdf, and leaves
> no intermediate f
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:09:40PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Please don’t do that: the build system purposefully avoids recursive
> makefiles, to improve parallelism etc. (see
> <http://miller.emu.id.au/pmiller/books/rmch/>.)
I did it for two reasons:
- It allows to type &quo
ctory doc.
Please don’t do that: the build system purposefully avoids recursive
makefiles, to improve parallelism etc. (see
<http://miller.emu.id.au/pmiller/books/rmch/>.)
However, the snippet about the ‘doc’ directory could be moved in, say,
doc.am, and have doc.am included from Makefile.am.
WDYT?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
