Re: Request-For-Comment process: concrete implementation

2024-02-03 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi Ricardo, On mer., 20 déc. 2023 at 12:49, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > I just got back from travels and finally caught up with important email. > I read the proposal and it looks good to me. Thank you for working on > this! > > This would be the first project I contribute to that has an RFC

Re: Request-For-Comment process: concrete implementation

2023-12-20 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Hi Simon, > Well, more than 7 weeks later… Hum, does it mean that the Guix project > is not interested in formalizing some RFC? > > WDYT about the proposal? I just got back from travels and finally caught up with important email. I read the proposal and it looks good to me. Thank you for

Re: Request-For-Comment process: concrete implementation

2023-12-19 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi, Well, more than 7 weeks later… Hum, does it mean that the Guix project is not interested in formalizing some RFC? WDYT about the proposal? On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 12:14, Simon Tournier wrote: > Hi, > > This is a proposal for implementing Request-For-Comment process. > Comment are welcome in

Re: Request-For-Comment process: concrete implementation

2023-11-28 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi Efraim, Thnaks for your comments. On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 at 09:04, Efraim Flashner wrote: > Actually, in terms of suggestions, I'd add the rfc/ folder in > etc/teams.scm to set guix-devel as one of the team members. Good idea! Cheers, simon

Re: Request-For-Comment process: concrete implementation

2023-11-22 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 12:14:42PM +0100, Simon Tournier wrote: > Hi, > > This is a proposal for implementing Request-For-Comment process. > Comment are welcome in #66844 [1]: > > 1: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/66844 > > > The proposal is highly inspired by Rust RFC: > >

Re: Request-For-Comment process: concrete implementation

2023-11-22 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Simon Tournier skribis: > On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 at 16:03, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> Thanks for starting the discussion! I think that getting such a process >> in place is key to sustain friction-less development of Guix, giving >> everyone a chance to have their voice heard. > > Do you have

Re: Request-For-Comment process: concrete implementation

2023-11-20 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi Ludo, Thanks for giving a look. On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 at 16:03, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Thanks for starting the discussion! I think that getting such a process > in place is key to sustain friction-less development of Guix, giving > everyone a chance to have their voice heard. Do you have

Re: Request-For-Comment process: concrete implementation

2023-11-16 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Simon Tournier skribis: > This is a proposal for implementing Request-For-Comment process. > Comment are welcome in #66844 [1]: > > 1: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/66844 Thanks for starting the discussion! I think that getting such a process in place is key to sustain

Request-For-Comment process: concrete implementation

2023-10-31 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi, This is a proposal for implementing Request-For-Comment process. Comment are welcome in #66844 [1]: 1: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/66844 The proposal is highly inspired by Rust RFC: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs and also by GHC Haskell proposal process [1] and Nix RFC