Personally, I'm against mentioning these in the download page, the
reason being that I *think* it is somewhat like recommending non-free
system distributions.
ng0 writes:
>
> By my own observation, systems including Guix either officially
> or by third-party / community
Am 07.10.2017 um 12:11 schrieb ng0:
> If it helps, this is how cURL/gnURL creates rpms (or at least cURL):
> […]
> rpm -ba --clean --rmsource $$RPM_TOPDIR/SPECS/$(RPMDIST).spec ; \
I'm afraid this information does not help much, since they "simply" run
the rpm build command and process
Ricardo Wurmus transcribed 0.5K bytes:
>
> Christopher Allan Webber writes:
>
> > Since these don't provide Guix in the main repo (and Debian won't
> > because we violate the FHS with /gnu/) we could probably auto-generate
> > the .deb or .rpm from some gexp?
>
> I was
Hello,
In other news, somebody is trying to get Nix into Debian:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=877019
Might be worth seeing if they manage to overcome the administrative
issues, which are going to be the same as for Guix.
(Seen on
Christopher Allan Webber skribis:
> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>
>> Christopher Allan Webber writes:
>>
>>> Since these don't provide Guix in the main repo (and Debian won't
>>> because we violate the FHS with /gnu/) we could probably auto-generate
Mark H Weaver writes:
> Hi Chris,
Hi Mark,
> Christopher Allan Webber writes:
>
>> Mark H Weaver writes:
>>
>>> Tobias Platen writes:
>>>
On 02.10.2017 20:52, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
> Since these don't provide Guix in the
Hi Chris,
Christopher Allan Webber writes:
> Mark H Weaver writes:
>
>> Tobias Platen writes:
>>
>>> On 02.10.2017 20:52, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
Since these don't provide Guix in the main repo (and Debian won't
because we
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Christopher Allan Webber writes:
>
>> Since these don't provide Guix in the main repo (and Debian won't
>> because we violate the FHS with /gnu/) we could probably auto-generate
>> the .deb or .rpm from some gexp?
>
> I was thinking about adding
Mark H Weaver writes:
> Tobias Platen writes:
>
>> On 02.10.2017 20:52, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
>>> Since these don't provide Guix in the main repo (and Debian won't
>>> because we violate the FHS with /gnu/) we could probably auto-generate
>>> the .deb or
> And I should add that we are committed to supporting Guix usage on other
> distros. This is an important use case.
Many thanks regarding this and other replies. I'll send follow up
questions in new threads.
Regards,
David
Christopher Allan Webber writes:
> Since these don't provide Guix in the main repo (and Debian won't
> because we violate the FHS with /gnu/) we could probably auto-generate
> the .deb or .rpm from some gexp?
I was thinking about adding support for the “deb” package
Tobias Platen writes:
> On 02.10.2017 20:52, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
>> Since these don't provide Guix in the main repo (and Debian won't
>> because we violate the FHS with /gnu/) we could probably auto-generate
>> the .deb or .rpm from some gexp?
>>
>
On 02.10.2017 20:52, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
> ng0 writes:
>
>> Christopher Allan Webber transcribed 0.6K bytes:
>>> Konrad Hinsen writes:
>>>
On 02/10/2017 11:18, David Seaward wrote:
> To what extent is support for other distros a priority for the Guix
> project? In
Hi David,
On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 11:18:12AM +0200, David Seaward wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> To what extent is support for other distros a priority for the Guix
> project? In other words, explicitly planning to make Guix available as
> an alternate installation source on non-Guix-SD distros.
>
> The
Christopher Allan Webber transcribed 1.7K bytes:
> ng0 writes:
>
> > Christopher Allan Webber transcribed 0.6K bytes:
> >> Konrad Hinsen writes:
> >>
> >> > On 02/10/2017 11:18, David Seaward wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> To what extent is support for other distros a priority for the Guix
> >> >>
ng0 writes:
> Christopher Allan Webber transcribed 0.6K bytes:
>> Konrad Hinsen writes:
>>
>> > On 02/10/2017 11:18, David Seaward wrote:
>> >
>> >> To what extent is support for other distros a priority for the Guix
>> >> project? In other words, explicitly planning to make Guix available as
>>
Hi,
David Seaward writes:
> To what extent is support for other distros a priority for the Guix
> project? In other words, explicitly planning to make Guix available as
> an alternate installation source on non-Guix-SD distros.
>
> The reason I ask is that cross-distro
Christopher Allan Webber transcribed 0.6K bytes:
> Konrad Hinsen writes:
>
> > On 02/10/2017 11:18, David Seaward wrote:
> >
> >> To what extent is support for other distros a priority for the Guix
> >> project? In other words, explicitly planning to make Guix available as
> >> an alternate
Konrad Hinsen writes:
> On 02/10/2017 11:18, David Seaward wrote:
>
>> To what extent is support for other distros a priority for the Guix
>> project? In other words, explicitly planning to make Guix available as
>> an alternate installation source on non-Guix-SD distros.
>
> That's already
Hello,
Konrad Hinsen skribis:
> On 02/10/2017 11:18, David Seaward wrote:
>
>> To what extent is support for other distros a priority for the Guix
>> project? In other words, explicitly planning to make Guix available as
>> an alternate installation source on
On 02/10/2017 11:18, David Seaward wrote:
To what extent is support for other distros a priority for the Guix
project? In other words, explicitly planning to make Guix available as
an alternate installation source on non-Guix-SD distros.
That's already possible right now. Go to the download
Hi all,
To what extent is support for other distros a priority for the Guix
project? In other words, explicitly planning to make Guix available as
an alternate installation source on non-Guix-SD distros.
The reason I ask is that cross-distro installers are increasingly
popular (for example,
22 matches
Mail list logo