On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 11:34:35AM +0200, Josselin Poiret wrote:
> I'm curious Leo, in general (not Guix because we have a pre-push hook),
> how do you make sure you always publish signed commits? I don't want to
> put unsigned commits anywhere except locally, but it feels like I might
> just
On 2023-05-24, Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System
distribution." wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 2:01 PM Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>
>> Please revert ASAP.
>
> I am not affected, but if I understood Maxim's message from 5/18
> correctly, the signature requirement was
Hi Vagrant,
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 2:01 PM Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>
> Please revert ASAP.
I am not affected, but if I understood Maxim's message from 5/18
correctly, the signature requirement was already reverted:
On 2023-05-19, Simon Tournier wrote:
> On ven., 19 mai 2023 at 11:34, Josselin Poiret wrote:
>> I'm curious Leo, in general (not Guix because we have a pre-push hook),
>> how do you make sure you always publish signed commits? I don't want to
>> put unsigned commits anywhere except locally, but
Hi Josselin,
On ven., 19 mai 2023 at 11:34, Josselin Poiret wrote:
> I'm curious Leo, in general (not Guix because we have a pre-push hook),
> how do you make sure you always publish signed commits? I don't want to
> put unsigned commits anywhere except locally, but it feels like I might
>
Hi Maxim and Leo,
Maxim Cournoyer writes:
> Thanks for voicing your thoughts on this. I originally thought the
> included fragments (via the 'include.path' git config option) could we
> overridden by a user but it seems they can't, making the change more
> intrusive than it should have been.
Hi Leo,
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 09:38:33AM -0400, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> Hi Leo,
>>
>> Leo Famulari writes:
>>
>> > Can someone help me by pointing to the original discussion of this
>> > change?
>>
>> It was the team.scm issue in https://issues.guix.gnu.org/58813
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 09:38:33AM -0400, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Hi Leo,
>
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
> > Can someone help me by pointing to the original discussion of this
> > change?
>
> It was the team.scm issue in https://issues.guix.gnu.org/58813 that led
> to this change.
Thanks for
