Hartmut Goebel writes:
> Am 06.11.2017 um 22:29 schrieb Marius Bakke:
>>> Seems like my message did not go through:
>>>
>>> This change will not solve out problem!
>>>
>>> PEP 552 proposes a new file-format for .pyc file and a hash-based
>>> mechanism for checking if the .pyc file is recent. This
iirc there is even an env var you can set -- PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=anyvalue
-- which will prevent these .pyc files from ever being generated.
There are no ill effects to this I have ever noticed in several years of having
it set in my bashrc.
On 6 November 2017 12:47:03 CET, "Gábor Boskovits"
Am 07.11.2017 um 10:55 schrieb Eric Myhre:
> iirc there is even an env var you can set -- PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=anyvalue
> -- which will prevent these .pyc files from ever being generated.
>
> There are no ill effects to this I have ever noticed in several years of
> having it set in my bashrc.
Am 06.11.2017 um 22:29 schrieb Marius Bakke:
>> Seems like my message did not go through:
>>
>> This change will not solve out problem!
>>
>> PEP 552 proposes a new file-format for .pyc file and a hash-based
>> mechanism for checking if the .pyc file is recent. This means, you can
>> not backport t
Hartmut Goebel writes:
> Am 06.11.2017 um 09:52 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
>>> [15:37:41] At this stage we might as well wait for this to land
>>> upstream: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0552/
>>>
>>> So, it seems, that we are waiting for this pep to land upstream.
>> Cool, thanks for the no
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello,
>
> Gábor Boskovits skribis:
>
>> Yesteday we had a discussion about that on irc.
>> Here it goes:
>>
>>
>> [15:15:16] hello guix!
>> [15:16:01] do we have a proposed way to build pyc files
>> reproducibly?
>> [15:16:50] I've read in the report, that we are no
Ok, I think we should try the patch the bytecode complier way.
WDYT?
Rekado mentioned that setting the times would be an easier way to go, but
breaks some tests...
I guess they were also discussing options on irc.
You are right, backporting does not seem to be a good option here.
Regarding messag
Am 06.11.2017 um 09:52 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
>> [15:37:41] At this stage we might as well wait for this to land
>> upstream: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0552/
>>
>> So, it seems, that we are waiting for this pep to land upstream.
> Cool, thanks for the notification.
Seems like my messa
Hello,
Gábor Boskovits skribis:
> Yesteday we had a discussion about that on irc.
> Here it goes:
>
>
> [15:15:16] hello guix!
> [15:16:01] do we have a proposed way to build pyc files
> reproducibly?
> [15:16:50] I've read in the report, that we are not there yet, but
> is someone working on
Gábor Boskovits transcribed 5.3K bytes:
> Yesteday we had a discussion about that on irc.
> Here it goes:
>
>
> [15:15:16] hello guix!
> [15:16:01] do we have a proposed way to build pyc files
> reproducibly?
> [15:16:50] I've read in the report, that we are not there yet, but
> is someone wor
Am 05.11.2017 um 20:04 schrieb Gábor Boskovits:
> [15:37:41]At this stage we might as well wait for this to land
> upstream: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0552/
Bad news: PEP 552 proposes a new file-format for .pyc file, so this
change can not be back-ported to Python 3.6 and older.
--
Reg
Yesteday we had a discussion about that on irc.
Here it goes:
[15:15:16] hello guix!
[15:16:01] do we have a proposed way to build pyc files
reproducibly?
[15:16:50] I've read in the report, that we are not there yet, but
is someone working on it?
[15:17:58] g_bor: This is the report you ment
Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Here’s an update on reproducibility in Guix:
>>
>>
>> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/news/reproducible-builds-a-status-update.html
>
> At least 78% to possibly 91% reproduciblility of packages is not bad.
>
> Is there a (small) core
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Here’s an update on reproducibility in Guix:
>
>
> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/news/reproducible-builds-a-status-update.html
At least 78% to possibly 91% reproduciblility of packages is not bad.
Is there a (small) core that is already 100% reprocucible, like th
Hello Guix!
Here’s an update on reproducibility in Guix:
https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/news/reproducible-builds-a-status-update.html
Happy hacking! :-)
Ludo’.
15 matches
Mail list logo