Howdy!
Vagrant Cascadian skribis:
> FWIW, on Debian guix 1.3.0 is currently at risk due to armhf and
> i386/i686-linux missings builds due to test suite failures. It has been
> hard to keep up with Guix in Debian, especially supporting "obscure"
> platforms...
>
> Though I'm guessing there may
On 2022-10-07, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 04:50:22PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Firstly, I'd like to mention that we, in general, have a minimum system
> requirement of 2GB of RAM, and IIRC there aren't a lot of armhf boards
> out there which have that much. We do have
Efraim Flashner writes:
> Firstly, I'd like to mention that we, in general, have a minimum system
> requirement of 2GB of RAM, and IIRC there aren't a lot of armhf boards
> out there which have that much. We do have a difference between building
> natively and cross building / building with
Hi,
Efraim Flashner skribis:
> I'd like to comment on armhf for a moment. My memory is a but rusty, but
> I'm pretty sure that in December of 2021 mesa was bumped from 21.2.x to
> 21.3.x, and at that time it stopped building on/for armhf. I noticed in
> May of 2022 (5 months later) and got the
on.
> Coordination is key. I don’t think I should be spearheading that
> effort, but I’m happy to be part of it.
>
> Who’s ready to commit time towards that goal for the coming weeks?
>
> Here’s a list of things to do to get there:
>
> • Get base binaries on all support
