On 17 Jan 09:53 Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Mikhail Kryshen writes:
>
> > - font files are missing from texlive-latex-lh (shouldn't it be
> > called texlive-lh?).
>
> Thank you, that’s a good one. Generally, the texlive-latex-* packages
> are of the old type that may very well be incomplete.
Hey Marius,
> Marius Bakke writes:
>
>> I'll look into updating the remaining texlive packages shortly.
>
> Now this was some rocket science...
>
> The attached 9 patches updates everything (I think) to 2019.3.
This looks great!
It’s odd that they removed the few remaining scripts for
Mikhail Kryshen writes:
> - font files are missing from texlive-latex-lh (shouldn't it be called
> texlive-lh?).
Thank you, that’s a good one. Generally, the texlive-latex-* packages
are of the old type that may very well be incomplete. I’ll replace this
one with texlive-lh which will
Hello,
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Pierre Neidhardt writes:
>
>> What I wanted to work on is packaging all the texlive packages
>> according to the tlpdb (the TexLive package database). This should fix
>> the broken packages. Not sure if there is something else wrong with the
>> fonts.
>
>
Pierre Neidhardt writes:
> Bug 33094 refers to this issue.
>
> There is no bug specifically about LaTeX, but LaTeX on Guix has been
> broken for a year or so. I think it was only discussed informally on
> guix-devel.
I’ve worked to fix incomplete packages some time ago. That’s why I
Bug 33094 refers to this issue.
There is no bug specifically about LaTeX, but LaTeX on Guix has been
broken for a year or so. I think it was only discussed informally on
guix-devel.
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Pierre Neidhardt writes:
> What I wanted to work on is packaging all the texlive packages
> according to the tlpdb (the TexLive package database). This should fix
> the broken packages. Not sure if there is something else wrong with the
> fonts.
This has already been done for most of the
Marius Bakke writes:
> I get a similar error for 'asymptote' on the current master branch, but
> that seems to be sporadically working on Berlin?
>
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/search?query=system%3Ax86_64-linux+asymptote
Yes, this issue has been around for about a year now. I can't explain
why
Marius Bakke writes:
> I'll look into updating the remaining texlive packages shortly.
Now this was some rocket science...
The attached 9 patches updates everything (I think) to 2019.3.
The only regression I found from 'master' was that "discrover" fails to
find math fonts during the build
Andreas Enge writes:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 11:41:57PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> Errh, the patch only works if you already have Poppler 0.83.0. For the
>> current 'core-updates' branch, I believe you can use the same approach
>> but fetch poppler-0.76.0.cc instead (or take Arch's
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 11:41:57PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Errh, the patch only works if you already have Poppler 0.83.0. For the
> current 'core-updates' branch, I believe you can use the same approach
> but fetch poppler-0.76.0.cc instead (or take Arch's patch[0]).
Ah, this is rocket
Marius Bakke writes:
> Andreas Enge writes:
>
>> I gave it a try, dropped the patches, then the phase use-code-for-new-poppler
>> fails for texlive-bin; maybe these poppler phases can be dropped, but I am
>> not quite familiar with them.
>
> The 'use-code-for-new-poppler' phase needs to be
Marius Bakke writes:
> Wrt the other TeX packages, I think %texlive-tag and %texlive-revision
> from (guix build-system texlive) needs to be bumped, and all the hashes
> changed accordingly.
Yes, that’s pretty much it. It’s a little tedious as so many hashes
will be invalidated at once.
Andreas Enge writes:
> I gave it a try, dropped the patches, then the phase use-code-for-new-poppler
> fails for texlive-bin; maybe these poppler phases can be dropped, but I am
> not quite familiar with them.
The 'use-code-for-new-poppler' phase needs to be rewritten along these
lines (for
I gave it a try, dropped the patches, then the phase use-code-for-new-poppler
fails for texlive-bin; maybe these poppler phases can be dropped, but I am
not quite familiar with them.
Andreas
Hello,
On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 08:06:19PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Ricardo, do you think you'll have time for a TeX Live 2019 update in the
> coming weeks? If not, could you outline the required changes for
> enterprising Guix contributors?
before your mail I had already tried to update the
Greetings Guix,
The latest version of the popular Poppler PDF library (slated for the
'core-updates' branch) unsurprisingly[0][1][2] breaks 'texlive-bin'.
Previously we were able to rely on the work of other distributions, but
most have moved on to 2019 by now. And the required changes now are
17 matches
Mail list logo
