> How about 'package/variant' or 'package/variant-of'?
+1 for trying to capture the intention in the name, instead of the means of
implementation.
--
• attila lendvai
• PGP: 963F 5D5F 45C7 DFCD 0A39
--
“Although teachers do care and do work very, very hard, the institution is
psychopathic-it h
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes:
> But I'll gladly judge other bikesheds if they lead to a less misleading name.
How about 'package/variant' or 'package/variant-of'?
-- (
Hi,
On Fri, 03 Mar 2023 at 20:21, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> Could we rename it to something like
> ‘package+replacements/inherit’? To me, that captures the spirit,
> without being overly longer.
Well, I gave a look at the code and have seen the replacement. But I
had not thought about
Hi!
Maxim Cournoyer 写道：
Simon Tournier writes:
It is not clear for me why you choose one over the other. From
my
current understanding, I would be tempted to always use
'package/inherit' and never plain 'inherit'.
I also got confused by that in the past;
Same. I think it's a rite of pas
