Hi,
On Sun, 04 Dec 2022 at 11:35, indieterminacy
wrote:
> Given Fosshost's place in the ecosystem: is this something which
> requires mitigating at the Guix end?
On Sun, 04 Dec 2022 at 13:16, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> - They hosted a Big Blue Button instance[0] only for the duration
>
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes:
> indieterminacy 写道：
>> Given Fosshost's place in the ecosystem: is this something which
>> requires mitigating at the Guix end?
>
> I'm aware of two dealings with Fosshost in the past, neither of them
> crucial:
> - They hosted a Big Blue Button instance[0] only fo
Hi Jonathan,
indieterminacy 写道：
Given Fosshost's place in the ecosystem: is this something which
requires mitigating at the Guix end?
I'm aware of two dealings with Fosshost in the past, neither of
them crucial:
- They hosted a Big Blue Button instance[0] only for the duration
of our COVID
Unfortunately Fosshost is being wound down, due to organistional
failings at the executive level.
https://fosshost.org/
Given Fosshost's place in the ecosystem: is this something which
requires mitigating at the Guix end?
--
Jonathan McHugh
indieterminacy@libre.brussels
