BUMP
> Hi Ludo,
>
> > > I agree with 宋文武 regarding ‘file-system-service-type’.
> > > raid5atemyhomework raid5atemyhomew...@protonmail.com skribis:
> > >
> > > > However, for the case where the user expects the "typical" ZFS style of
> > > > managing file systems, we need to mount all the ZFS
Hi Ludo,
> > I agree with 宋文武 regarding ‘file-system-service-type’.
> > raid5atemyhomework raid5atemyhomew...@protonmail.com skribis:
> >
> > > However, for the case where the user expects the "typical" ZFS style of
> > > managing file systems, we need to mount all the ZFS file systems and
> >
Hi Ludo'
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for the delay; this isn’t as simple as it looks!
>
> I agree with 宋文武 regarding ‘file-system-service-type’.
>
> raid5atemyhomework raid5atemyhomew...@protonmail.com skribis:
>
> > However, for the case where the user expects the "typical" ZFS style of
> > managing file
Hi,
Sorry for the delay; this isn’t as simple as it looks!
I agree with 宋文武 regarding ‘file-system-service-type’.
raid5atemyhomework skribis:
> However, for the case where the user expects the "typical" ZFS style of
> managing file systems, we need to mount all the ZFS file systems and
raid5atemyhomework writes:
> Hi guix-devel,
>
> I had some questions on the big ZFS guix bugpatches a week ago, and
> did not find any response, so I am back here pestering everyone.
Hello, thank you for working on ZFS for guix!
>
> [...]
> There are two alternatives:
>
> * Go with what I
Hi guix-devel,
I had some questions on the big ZFS guix bugpatches a week ago, and did not
find any response, so I am back here pestering everyone.
Anyway:
* I am wary of calling the service type that accepts kernel modules as
`linux-loadable-module-service-type`:
* The equivalent
