Hey,
> I suppose this line could be removed now.
Pushed, thanks for having a look.
Mathieu
Mathieu Othacehe writes:
Hey,
‘zile-on-guile’ is tempting but currently unmaintained. ‘mg’
could work too.
mg seems to work fine. I'm currently testing the attached
patch. Any
objections?
No objections, but one comment:
diff --git a/gnu/system.scm b/gnu/system.scm
index 8a3ae27d04.
Hey,
> ‘zile-on-guile’ is tempting but currently unmaintained. ‘mg’ could work too.
mg seems to work fine. I'm currently testing the attached patch. Any
objections?
Thanks,
Mathieu
>From 0cff5b30711a8987bc0457c23a73982888ec802e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mathieu Othacehe
Date: Fri, 9 Jul
On 08.07.2021 23:52, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Commit da40d07066096a3b5a852041ea01fbb32240deda updates Zile, but this
> new version seems to have little in common with previous ones. In
> particular, it has more dependencies and a larger footprint:
>
> --8<---cut here-
Hi!
Commit da40d07066096a3b5a852041ea01fbb32240deda updates Zile, but this
new version seems to have little in common with previous ones. In
particular, it has more dependencies and a larger footprint:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
$ guix size zile | tail -1
