On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 08:06:44PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Vincent Legoll writes:
> > For the tests they will be native-inputs, so only increase dependencies
> > for building, is that a problem ? I would have thought that test coverage
> > is more important (especially on such important packa
Vincent Legoll writes:
>> We’d probably have to decide on a case by case basis which additional
>> dependencies we’d like to add, given that Automake has a lot of
>> dependents.
>
> For the tests they will be native-inputs, so only increase dependencies
> for building, is that a problem ? I would
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 3:07 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > Trying to update automake to the latest, I'm seeing lots
> > of skipped tests because of missing native-inputs, would
> > it be OK toadd those to enable more tests to be run ?
>
> I hadn’t seen your message
Hi!
Vincent Legoll skribis:
> Trying to update automake to the latest, I'm seeing lots
> of skipped tests because of missing native-inputs, would
> it be OK toadd those to enable more tests to be run ?
I hadn’t seen your message and added Automake 1.
Hi,
Trying to update automake to the latest, I'm seeing lots
of skipped tests because of missing native-inputs, would
it be OK toadd those to enable more tests to be run ?
--
Vincent Legoll
