I’ve pushed the ‘python2-variant’ trick as 1be8334. Subsequent commits
use it for a bunch of packages.
I’ll let others handle the remaining packages where this would help.
:-)
Closing the bug!
Ludo’.
Efraim Flashner skribis:
> On Wed, 03 Feb 2016 09:47:15 +0100
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
[...]
>> This will trigger rebuilds (but with an identical result) because in
>> manually-written variants we would use “python2-foo” as the label of
>> inputs, whereas the automatic transforma
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Efraim Flashner writes:
>
>> On Wed, 03 Feb 2016 09:47:15 +0100
>> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
>>
>>> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
>>>
>>> > An idea I haven’t taken the time to test yet would be to use
>>> > ‘properties’:
>>> >
>>> > (define pyth
Andreas Enge skribis:
> this looks really good, but I do not understand why we need the
> additional private variable, for instance %python-cython:
Glad you noticed. :-)
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 09:47:15AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> -(define-public python-cython
>> +(define %python-cyth
Hello,
this looks really good, but I do not understand why we need the
additional private variable, for instance %python-cython:
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 09:47:15AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> -(define-public python-cython
> +(define %python-cython
>(package
> (name "python-cython")
>
Efraim Flashner writes:
> On Wed, 03 Feb 2016 09:47:15 +0100
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
>
>> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
>>
>> > An idea I haven’t taken the time to test yet would be to use
>> > ‘properties’:
>> >
>> > (define python-foobar ;with Python 3
>> > (
On Wed, 03 Feb 2016 09:47:15 +0100
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
>
> > An idea I haven’t taken the time to test yet would be to use
> > ‘properties’:
> >
> > (define python-foobar ;with Python 3
> > (package
> > (name "foobar")
> >
