Cyril Roelandt skribis:
> On 03/04/2014 06:10 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Cyril Roelandt skribis:
>>
>>> On 03/04/2014 10:35 AM, Nikita Karetnikov wrote:
./tests/misc/nohup.sh: line 66: /dev/tty: No such device or address
+ fail=1
>>>
>>> ./tests/misc/nohup.sh: line 66: /dev/tty: No
On 03/04/2014 06:10 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Cyril Roelandt skribis:
On 03/04/2014 10:35 AM, Nikita Karetnikov wrote:
./tests/misc/nohup.sh: line 66: /dev/tty: No such device or address
+ fail=1
./tests/misc/nohup.sh: line 66: /dev/tty: No such device or address
+ fail=1
Hum, this should
Cyril Roelandt skribis:
> On 03/04/2014 10:35 AM, Nikita Karetnikov wrote:
>> ./tests/misc/nohup.sh: line 66: /dev/tty: No such device or address
>> + fail=1
>
> ./tests/misc/nohup.sh: line 66: /dev/tty: No such device or address
> + fail=1
>
> Hum, this should probably be disabled :) I don't thi
On 03/04/2014 10:35 AM, Nikita Karetnikov wrote:
./tests/misc/nohup.sh: line 66: /dev/tty: No such device or address
+ fail=1
./tests/misc/nohup.sh: line 66: /dev/tty: No such device or address
+ fail=1
Hum, this should probably be disabled :) I don't think we can access
/dev/tty inside the c
Cyril reported this on IRC. Indeed, one of the tests fails (I tested on
i686). Is there a need to report upstream?
GNU coreutils 8.22: ./tests/test-suite.log
# TOTAL: 551
# PASS: 412
# SKIP: 1