On 2020-05-04, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2020-05-04, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> @everyone, please speak up if you find any of your packages failing on
>> the core-updates branch! The substitute coverage is currently ~90%,
>> which is better than on 'master'.
>
> I'm noticing libdbusmenu is failing
On 2020-05-04, Marius Bakke wrote:
> @everyone, please speak up if you find any of your packages failing on
> the core-updates branch! The substitute coverage is currently ~90%,
> which is better than on 'master'.
I'm noticing libdbusmenu is failing on aarch64 (which is a dependency of
waybar):
Marius Bakke writes:
> Christopher Baines writes:
>
>> Marius Bakke writes:
>>
>>> Please try upgrading your profiles and systems and file bugs for
>>> anything that does not work for you. GNOME users in particular are
>>> encouraged to try the new GNOME 3.34 and report any regressions.
>>
>>
Christopher Baines writes:
> Marius Bakke writes:
>
>> Please try upgrading your profiles and systems and file bugs for
>> anything that does not work for you. GNOME users in particular are
>> encouraged to try the new GNOME 3.34 and report any regressions.
>
> I did some testing today, I manag
Timothy Sample writes:
> Hi Marius,
>
> Marius Bakke writes:
>
>> The "core-updates" branch is ready for testing! [...]
>>
>> Please try upgrading your profiles and systems and file bugs for
>> anything that does not work for you. GNOME users in particular are
>> encouraged to try the new GNOM
Hi Marius,
Marius Bakke writes:
> The "core-updates" branch is ready for testing! [...]
>
> Please try upgrading your profiles and systems and file bugs for
> anything that does not work for you. GNOME users in particular are
> encouraged to try the new GNOME 3.34 and report any regressions.
Hi,
Marius Bakke skribis:
> I see a similar failure when tracing the associated mingetty process:
>
> 1003 sendto(4, "<83>Apr 29 14:49:20 login[1003]: PAM unable to
> dlopen(/gnu/store/44il8dnl5qc6ryb3v0lp5374hg3h7vx5-elogind-243.4/lib/security/pam_elogind.so):
> /gnu/store/ahqgl4h89xqj695lgq
Marius Bakke writes:
> Please try upgrading your profiles and systems and file bugs for
> anything that does not work for you. GNOME users in particular are
> encouraged to try the new GNOME 3.34 and report any regressions.
I did some testing today, I managed to upgrade my profile after I
excl
On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 15:07, Marius Bakke wrote:
>
> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>
> > Leo Famulari writes:
> >
> >> I'm doing `guix pull --branch=core-updates`, with a `guix describe` of
> >> commit a533c5a183 (core-updates from 2 weeks ago), on Debian, in tmux,
> >> and I see this weird thing:
> >
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
>> I'm doing `guix pull --branch=core-updates`, with a `guix describe` of
>> commit a533c5a183 (core-updates from 2 weeks ago), on Debian, in tmux,
>> and I see this weird thing:
>>
>> --
>> substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://privat
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 03:17:06PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> Leo Famulari writes:
>>
>> > I reconfigured my Guix System based on core-updates, and afterwards I
>> > was unable to login, either remotely over SSH, or on the Linux console.
>>
>> Do you still have the lo
sirgazil writes:
> And I've already seen that before (I mean those bars before the @ sign,
> etc.), but I don't know how it is supposed to be presented. That information
> usually makes no sense to me :P
This is definitely not supposed to be shown. Things like
@ download-progress
/
Leo Famulari writes:
> I'm doing `guix pull --branch=core-updates`, with a `guix describe` of
> commit a533c5a183 (core-updates from 2 weeks ago), on Debian, in tmux,
> and I see this weird thing:
>
> --
> substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://private.mirror'... 100.0%
> @ substitu
sirgazil writes:
> By the way, it would be great if someone could review this patch:
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/39069, which is supposed to fix bugs
> like this one: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/40686, which have
> been around for a long time and make the GNOME experience unsatisf
sirgazil writes:
> it seems that the comments mechanism in
> issues.gnu.org does not work.
yes, sorry about that. There’s a problem with the environment in which
the mailer service runs. It’s on my list to investigate and fix it.
(The messages aren’t lost. They are stuck in the queue.)
--
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 03:17:06PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
> > I reconfigured my Guix System based on core-updates, and afterwards I
> > was unable to login, either remotely over SSH, or on the Linux console.
>
> Do you still have the logs from this attempt? Curious
Leo Famulari writes:
> I reconfigured my Guix System based on core-updates, and afterwards I
> was unable to login, either remotely over SSH, or on the Linux console.
Do you still have the logs from this attempt? Curious what caused login
to fail.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Efraim Flashner writes:
> I have a package which currently depends on gfortran-5, although
> gfortran-5 doesn't build on core-updates.
>
> efraimf@penguin2:~/workspace/guix-core-updates$ ./pre-inst-env guix build
> --no-grafts -e '(@@ (gnu packages gcc) gfortran-5)'
> substitute: updating substi
I have a package which currently depends on gfortran-5, although
gfortran-5 doesn't build on core-updates.
efraimf@penguin2:~/workspace/guix-core-updates$ ./pre-inst-env guix build
--no-grafts -e '(@@ (gnu packages gcc) gfortran-5)'
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'.
On Sat, 25 Apr 2020, sirgazil wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 21:19:26 + Jack Hill wrote
> Does GNOME-Web work for you? I'm wondering if others can reproduce the
> problem I'm seeing: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/40837
No it doesn't.
Hi all,
Unfortunately, I think I'm current stuck
On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 21:19:26 + Jack Hill wrote
> On Sat, 25 Apr 2020, sirgazil wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 03:02:23 + Jack Hill
> > wrote
> > > I have not done extensive testing, but so far the desktop itself seems to
> > > be in working order, including
On Sat, 25 Apr 2020, sirgazil wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 03:02:23 + Jack Hill wrote
> I have not done extensive testing, but so far the desktop itself seems to
> be in working order, including cursory use of the GNOME settings dialog.
Same here. So far, things are working normal
On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 13:24:51 + sirgazil wrote
> On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 03:02:23 + Jack Hill
> wrote
> > On Fri, 24 Apr 2020, Marius Bakke wrote:
> >
> > > The "core-updates" branch is ready for testing!
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've reconfigured my user pr
On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 13:24:51 + sirgazil wrote
> On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 03:02:23 + Jack Hill
> wrote
> > On Fri, 24 Apr 2020, Marius Bakke wrote:
> >
> > > The "core-updates" branch is ready for testing!
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've reconfigured my user pr
I reconfigured my Guix System based on core-updates, and afterwards I
was unable to login, either remotely over SSH, or on the Linux console.
After cutting the power to the computer and turning it back on, I was
able to log in.
I've attached my configuration file for your reference.
;; This is an
On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 03:02:23 + Jack Hill wrote
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2020, Marius Bakke wrote:
>
> > The "core-updates" branch is ready for testing!
>
> Hi,
>
> I've reconfigured my user profile and system from the core-updates branch.
> I use a GNOME desktop session. However
On Fri, 24 Apr 2020, Marius Bakke wrote:
The "core-updates" branch is ready for testing!
Hi,
I've reconfigured my user profile and system from the core-updates branch.
I use a GNOME desktop session. However, I don't use too many fancy
features. I mostly use GNOME-Terminal, GNOME-Web, and Em
On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 21:52:54 + Marius Bakke
wrote
> sirgazil writes:
>
> > This time, one of my packages in a custom channel failed with "no code for
> > (term ansi-color)" (the package definition:
> > https://gitlab.com/sirgazil/guix-channel-x/-/blob/master/sirgazil-x/pac
sirgazil writes:
> This time, one of my packages in a custom channel failed with "no code for
> (term ansi-color)" (the package definition:
> https://gitlab.com/sirgazil/guix-channel-x/-/blob/master/sirgazil-x/packages/guile.scm#L13).
> This is not a new package in my profile, I've been using
On Fri, 24 Apr 2020, Marius Bakke wrote:
The "core-updates" branch is ready for testing!
pdfpc currently fails to build on core-updates. Upgrading to the latest
pdfpc release fixes the issue.
Patch upgrading pdfpc is at: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/40829
Best,
Jack
On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 16:54:19 + Gábor Boskovits
wrote
> Hello,
>
> Marius Bakke ezt írta (időpont: 2020. ápr. 24., Pén
> 18:25):
>
> This comes up from time to time. It is locale related. I think we tried to
> fix this several times. Fallback always helps. The not so nic
On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 03:20:41 + sirgazil wrote
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 23:24:23 + Marius Bakke
> wrote
> > Hello Guix!
> >
> > The "core-updates" branch is ready for testing! According to 'guix
> > weather', the substitute coverage is slightly better than o
On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 16:25:13 + Marius Bakke
wrote
> sirgazil writes:
>
> > On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 03:20:41 + sirgazil
> > wrote
> > > On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 23:24:23 + Marius Bakke
> > wrote
> > > > Hello Guix!
> > > >
> > > > The "cor
Hello,
Marius Bakke ezt írta (időpont: 2020. ápr. 24., Pén
18:25):
> sirgazil writes:
>
> > On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 03:20:41 + sirgazil
> wrote
> > > On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 23:24:23 + Marius Bakke <
> mba...@fastmail.com> wrote
> > > > Hello Guix!
> > > >
> > > >
sirgazil writes:
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 03:20:41 + sirgazil wrote
>
> > On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 23:24:23 + Marius Bakke
> wrote
> > > Hello Guix!
> > >
> > > The "core-updates" branch is ready for testing! According to 'guix
> > > weather', the substitute c
On Fri, 24 Apr 2020, Marius Bakke wrote:
The "core-updates" branch is ready for testing!
Thanks Marius and others who have worked on core-updates. It's exciting to
see these updates nearing completion.
In my testing so far, I've noticed that font-gnu-freefont fails to build:
https://issues
On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 03:20:41 + sirgazil wrote
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 23:24:23 + Marius Bakke
> wrote
> > Hello Guix!
> >
> > The "core-updates" branch is ready for testing! According to 'guix
> > weather', the substitute coverage is slightly better th
On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 23:24:23 + Marius Bakke
wrote
> Hello Guix!
>
> The "core-updates" branch is ready for testing! According to 'guix
> weather', the substitute coverage is slightly better than on "master"
> for x86_64. You can get it by running:
>
> guix pull --branc
On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 23:45:51 + Leo Famulari
wrote
> I'm doing `guix pull --branch=core-updates`, with a `guix describe` of
> commit a533c5a183 (core-updates from 2 weeks ago), on Debian, in tmux,
> and I see this weird thing:
>
> --
> substitute: updating substitutes
I'm doing `guix pull --branch=core-updates`, with a `guix describe` of
commit a533c5a183 (core-updates from 2 weeks ago), on Debian, in tmux,
and I see this weird thing:
--
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://private.mirror'... 100.0%
@ substituter-started
/gnu/store/zfskbazynmdgmr
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 01:24:23AM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
Testing now!
First feedback, this warning is new IIRC, based on commit 69c2e01:
Computing Guix derivation for 'x86_64-linux'... WARNING: (guix build
emacs-build-system): imported module (guix build utils) overrides core binding
`del
Hello Guix!
The "core-updates" branch is ready for testing! According to 'guix
weather', the substitute coverage is slightly better than on "master"
for x86_64. You can get it by running:
guix pull --branch=core-updates
Please try upgrading your profiles and systems and file bugs for
anythin
42 matches
Mail list logo
