> Oh, nice! Did increasing the nginx timeouts help?
Yes, it definitely helped, but there are still some request timeouts. I
hope that the publish patches we are discussing here[1] can fix this
situation.
Thanks,
Mathieu
[1]: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/50040
Hi!
Mathieu Othacehe skribis:
> The situation is getting better here:
>
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org
> 81.1% substitutes available (16,148 out of 19,921)
> at least 112,494.5 MiB of nars (compressed)
> 17,592,186,161,392.5 MiB on disk (uncompressed)
> 0.006 seconds per request (29.4
Hello,
The situation is getting better here:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
https://ci.guix.gnu.org
81.1% substitutes available (16,148 out of 19,921)
at least 112,494.5 MiB of nars (compressed)
17,592,186,161,392.5 MiB on disk (uncompressed)
0.006
Hey,
> Okay, are you confident in the #50040 patch? It looks like there are a
> lot of spurious failures from #48468.
I just discovered that many spurious failures were also caused by short
Nginx timeout values. Added a comment about that on #50040. I'm also
currently experimenting directly on
On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 02:57:51AM +0200, zimoun wrote:
> The command you posted works if you previously did:
>
> guix pull --branch=core-updates-frozen
Right! This is what I did in the last round (staging?), but this time I
am not ready to pull.
> instead, I am using:
>
> guix
On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 08:53:08AM +0200, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
> Thanks for the reports! Cuirass is actually trying to build all packages
> on top of the core-updates-frozen branch.
Oh, good to know! And are the results gcroots?
> A few weeks ago, I tried to work around the substitute timeout
Hello Leo,
> As far as I can tell, the build farms are not actually trying to build
> for core-updates-frozen, at least not in a systematic way. Am I
> mistaken? Or are we only building the core subset of packages for this
> branch?
Thanks for the reports! Cuirass is actually trying to build
Hi Leo,
On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 at 17:05, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 03:10:00PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> I'm preparing some weather reports now. Basically, I use this command:
>
> Here they are! Things to note:
The command you posted works if you previously did:
guix pull
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 08:23:03PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> As far as I can tell, the build farms are not actually trying to build
> for core-updates-frozen, at least not in a systematic way. Am I
> mistaken? Or are we only building the core subset of packages for this
> branch?
I think it
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 07:33:04PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> I messed up the weather reports. I think they are based on the master
> branch, not core-updates-frozen. I'll try again now.
Alright, this time I actually used the correct branch.
As far as I can tell, the build farms are not
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 07:25:21PM -0400, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> Ant-bootstrap is correctly reported, with around 600 dependents. With 18000
> packages (on master), that's already 3% of packages. Maybe guix weather
> doesn't report numbers properly, or is it 3% of packages with at least 10
>
Ant-bootstrap is correctly reported, with around 600 dependents. With 18000
packages (on master), that's already 3% of packages. Maybe guix weather doesn't
report numbers properly, or is it 3% of packages with at least 10 dependents?
Le 20 août 2021 19:08:45 GMT-04:00, Leo Famulari a écrit :
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 05:40:18PM -0400, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> We are still missing all of java, see http://issues.guix.gnu.org/49990
Thanks for the note. Is java contained within the missing 3% of
packages? Or is `guix weather` broken?
We are still missing all of java, see http://issues.guix.gnu.org/49990
That issue doesn't make any sense, and even with a workaround, icedtea1 fails
to build.
Le 20 août 2021 17:05:57 GMT-04:00, Leo Famulari a écrit :
>On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 03:10:00PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> I'm
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 03:10:00PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> I'm preparing some weather reports now. Basically, I use this command:
Here they are! Things to note:
These reports list missing packages with 10 or more dependents. So,
important leaf packages may be missing... please try upgrading
15 matches
Mail list logo
