Re: documentation/behavior unclear of (tor-hidden-service)

2017-03-06 Thread ng0
On 17-03-06 13:47:12, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 06:00:30PM +, ng0 wrote: > > from my experience they are not needed for a relay. Okay, they would be > > useful to increase security and to see how how Chinese government > > officials and their automated services want to get

Re: documentation/behavior unclear of (tor-hidden-service)

2017-03-06 Thread Leo Famulari
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 06:00:30PM +, ng0 wrote: > from my experience they are not needed for a relay. Okay, they would be > useful to increase security and to see how how Chinese government > officials and their automated services want to get into your server, but > it's not really necessary

Re: documentation/behavior unclear of (tor-hidden-service)

2017-03-06 Thread ng0
On 17-03-06 08:19:00, dian_ce...@zoho.com wrote: > On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 12:08:20 + > ng0 wrote:> > > Maybe someone else can try and implement this, I only know what'S > > needed for running the relay but can't do it at the moment ;) > > Just for reference sake: >

Re: documentation/behavior unclear of (tor-hidden-service)

2017-03-06 Thread dian_cecht
On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 12:08:20 + ng0 wrote:> > Maybe someone else can try and implement this, I only know what'S > needed for running the relay but can't do it at the moment ;) Just for reference sake: https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-doc-relay.html.en What is

Re: documentation/behavior unclear of (tor-hidden-service)

2017-03-06 Thread Ludovic Courtès
ng0 skribis: > On 17-03-06 11:13:32, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Hi! >> >> ng0 skribis: >> >> > moving on, this could be improved: >> > In case one aims for keeping the config public this is a bad idea but >> > what about creating the

Re: documentation/behavior unclear of (tor-hidden-service)

2017-03-06 Thread ng0
On 17-03-06 11:13:32, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi! > > ng0 skribis: > > > moving on, this could be improved: > > In case one aims for keeping the config public this is a bad idea but > > what about creating the hostname + private_key in $name as plain-file? > > Would

Re: documentation/behavior unclear of (tor-hidden-service)

2017-03-06 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi! ng0 skribis: > moving on, this could be improved: > In case one aims for keeping the config public this is a bad idea but > what about creating the hostname + private_key in $name as plain-file? > Would this be overwritten by (tor-hidden-service) or would this

Re: documentation/behavior unclear of (tor-hidden-service)

2017-03-04 Thread ng0
On 17-03-04 15:59:16, ng0 wrote: > I have a question regarding the (tor-hidden-service) service. > > When I have an previously generated hostname, let's call it > "fooschnickens1234.onion" for the purpose of this message, my approach > on a system like Gentoo was to manually place the hostname

documentation/behavior unclear of (tor-hidden-service)

2017-03-04 Thread ng0
I have a question regarding the (tor-hidden-service) service. When I have an previously generated hostname, let's call it "fooschnickens1234.onion" for the purpose of this message, my approach on a system like Gentoo was to manually place the hostname and private-key into the