On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 12:35 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi Federico,
>
> Federico Beffa skribis:
>
>> I've updated our ghc-8 Haskell compiler to the latest version (8.0.2)
>> and in doing so I've investigated why both 8.0.1 and 8.0.2 do not work
>>
Hi Federico,
Federico Beffa skribis:
> I've updated our ghc-8 Haskell compiler to the latest version (8.0.2)
> and in doing so I've investigated why both 8.0.1 and 8.0.2 do not work
> without setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the required system libraries.
> I've found th
beHi,
I've updated our ghc-8 Haskell compiler to the latest version (8.0.2)
and in doing so I've investigated why both 8.0.1 and 8.0.2 do not work
without setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the required system libraries.
I've found that NIX had the same problem. The root cause for them
ng0 writes:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> ng0 skribis:
>>
>>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>>
>>>> ng0 skribis:
>>>>
>>>>> should we package ghc 8 in core-updates? It was released in May:
>>>>&g
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> ng0 skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>
>>> ng0 skribis:
>>>
>>>> should we package ghc 8 in core-updates? It was released in May:
>>>> https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/blog/ghc-8.0.1-released
&g
ng0 skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> ng0 skribis:
>>
>>> should we package ghc 8 in core-updates? It was released in May:
>>> https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/blog/ghc-8.0.1-released
>>
>> Probably a good idea. :-)
>>
>> This
ng0 writes:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> ng0 skribis:
>>
>>> should we package ghc 8 in core-updates? It was released in May:
>>> https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/blog/ghc-8.0.1-released
>>
>> Probably a good idea. :-)
>>
>> This
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> ng0 skribis:
>
>> should we package ghc 8 in core-updates? It was released in May:
>> https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/blog/ghc-8.0.1-released
>
> Probably a good idea. :-)
>
> This can be done in ‘master’, or, if we change to default GHC
ng0 skribis:
> should we package ghc 8 in core-updates? It was released in May:
> https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/blog/ghc-8.0.1-released
Probably a good idea. :-)
This can be done in ‘master’, or, if we change to default GHC, to a
dedicated ‘ghc-update’ branch.
Ludo’.
Hi,
should we package ghc 8 in core-updates? It was released in May:
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/blog/ghc-8.0.1-released
I'm currently packaging darcs, but I can do the version bump
afterwards.
--
ng0
For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org
10 matches
Mail list logo