Hi,
Josselin Poiret skribis:
> From: Josselin Poiret
>
> * gnu/packages/patches/glibc-2.39-git-updates.patch: New patch.
> * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Register it.
> * gnu/packages/base.scm (glibc): Use it.
>
> Change-Id: I13ff3fa2eddd8296d138f87c9069487e9543b3bd
> ---
> How about the fol
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 03:32:09PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Leo Famulari skribis:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 09:10:12PM +1100, Jookia wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:10:14AM +0100, Andy Wingo wrote:
> >> > Given that seriousness of this bug and the amount of time that a full
> >>
Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 09:10:12PM +1100, Jookia wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:10:14AM +0100, Andy Wingo wrote:
>> > Given that seriousness of this bug and the amount of time that a full
>> > rebuild will take, does anyone have a graft recipe they would like to
>> >
ail.com>
> Sent: February 17, 2016 11:28:33 AM EST
> To: Leo Famulari
> Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: glibc update
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:14:19AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > I tried this. The resulting process downloaded the bootstrap binaries
> &
.com>
Sent: February 17, 2016 11:28:33 AM EST
To: Leo Famulari
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: glibc update
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:14:19AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> I tried this. The resulting process downloaded the bootstrap binaries
> and appeared to rebuild *everything*. I haven
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:14:19AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> I tried this. The resulting process downloaded the bootstrap binaries
> and appeared to rebuild *everything*. I haven't had time to figure out
> what actually got rebuilt and if anything is still using the vulnerable
> glibc.
This doe
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 03:20:10PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> I'm wondering if anyone has rebuilt their local systems based on the
> glibc update in security updates? I'm wondering what is the best way to
> achieve this?
>
> For Guix users, something like this?
&
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 09:10:12PM +1100, Jookia wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:10:14AM +0100, Andy Wingo wrote:
> > Given that seriousness of this bug and the amount of time that a full
> > rebuild will take, does anyone have a graft recipe they would like to
> > share?
>
> Not really, unfor
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:10:14AM +0100, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Given that seriousness of this bug and the amount of time that a full
> rebuild will take, does anyone have a graft recipe they would like to
> share?
Not really, unfortunately grafts are broken right now. I'm not sure how high a
priori
On Tue 16 Feb 2016 21:20, Leo Famulari writes:
> I'm wondering if anyone has rebuilt their local systems based on the
> glibc update in security updates? I'm wondering what is the best way to
> achieve this?
>
> For Guix users, something like this?
>
> $ git chec
I'm wondering if anyone has rebuilt their local systems based on the
glibc update in security updates? I'm wondering what is the best way to
achieve this?
For Guix users, something like this?
$ git checkout master \
&& git checkout -b my-branch \
11 matches
Mail list logo
