Re: imagemagick: license is Apache 2.0

2016-04-05 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Jean Louis skribis: > I have observed that package imagemagick, has license specified in the > definition as: FSF-free, even though I see on the website that they use > Apache 2.0 license. They use . Ludo’.

imagemagick: license is Apache 2.0

2016-04-04 Thread Jean Louis
I have observed that package imagemagick, has license specified in the definition as: FSF-free, even though I see on the website that they use Apache 2.0 license. It is better that correct license is specified in the package definition. Jean Louis