Hi,
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 at 12:28, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> My understanding is that feature-branches are now the canonical way to
>> work on things, and core-updates has become just another kind of
>> feature-branch for landing groups of large changes that don't really
>> fit anywhere; the
Hi Katherine,
Katherine Cox-Buday writes:
> On 9/24/23 1:27 AM, Andy Tai wrote:
>> Hi, curious if core-updates still a thing?There seems a branch by
>> that name and the manual still says patches causing large number of
>> rebuilds should go to core-updates, at least
Hi Andy,
Andy Tai writes:
> Hi, curious if core-updates still a thing?There seems a branch by
> that name and the manual still says patches causing large number of
> rebuilds should go to core-updates, at least for these not aiming at a
> specific feature branch.
It is. W
On 9/24/23 1:27 AM, Andy Tai wrote:
Hi, curious if core-updates still a thing?There seems a branch by
that name and the manual still says patches causing large number of
rebuilds should go to core-updates, at least for these not aiming at a
specific feature branch.
I have the same question
Hi, curious if core-updates still a thing?There seems a branch by
that name and the manual still says patches causing large number of
rebuilds should go to core-updates, at least for these not aiming at a
specific feature branch.
