Re: libtool archives introduce unwanted inputs to build

2016-03-19 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Jookia <166...@gmail.com> skribis: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 05:14:53PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> iyzs...@member.fsf.org (宋文武) skribis: >> I don’t think so. :-) >> >> From what I understand the problem is that we end up with the two >> variants of gdk-pixbuf in the dependency graph, and

Re: libtool archives introduce unwanted inputs to build

2016-03-15 Thread Ludovic Courtès
iyzs...@member.fsf.org (宋文武) skribis: > Report by Jookia in #guix that with my gdk-pixbuf+svg patches, > thunar still can't find SVG icons, it's linked with the old gdk-pixbuf. > > While the build inputs of ‘thunar’ only have ‘gdk-pixbuf+svg’, one > of its input ‘libnotify’ was build with

libtool archives introduce unwanted inputs to build

2016-03-14 Thread 宋文武
Report by Jookia in #guix that with my gdk-pixbuf+svg patches, thunar still can't find SVG icons, it's linked with the old gdk-pixbuf. While the build inputs of ‘thunar’ only have ‘gdk-pixbuf+svg’, one of its input ‘libnotify’ was build with ‘gdk-pixbuf’. It didn’t propagated it but it’s in