Re: qt: monolithic or modular?

On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 01:24:23PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > Ok, I wasn't aware that it took hydra that long to actually start > working on the next package set. This is not normal and should be fixed once the new machine will have arrived, and Mathieu's GSoC project is finished :-)

Re: qt: monolithic or modular?

On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 11:15:59AM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: > On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 10:24:18AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > > To be fair, it was only the arm build that took 3.5 hours, i686 and > > x86_64 both took about an hour. > > What took 3,5 hours was the "evaluation" on hydra: The

Re: qt: monolithic or modular?

On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 10:24:18AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > To be fair, it was only the arm build that took 3.5 hours, i686 and > x86_64 both took about an hour. What took 3,5 hours was the "evaluation" on hydra: The time between the moment I made hydra look at wip-qt, and the moment the

Re: qt: monolithic or modular?

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 10:30:32PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: > Hi Efraim, > > as you have noticed, I have created a wip-qt branch, mainly to test building > qtbase on mips. I removed the removal of mips; but it turns out that an input > is missing anyway. So I think we can include mips for the

Re: qt: monolithic or modular?

Hi again, in the end I dropped pciutils and udev, which were not referenced in the output of qtbase, and pushed to master. Thanks! Andreas

Re: qt: monolithic or modular?

Hi Efraim, as you have noticed, I have created a wip-qt branch, mainly to test building qtbase on mips. I removed the removal of mips; but it turns out that an input is missing anyway. So I think we can include mips for the time being, it does no harm and may serve as a reminder. It also builds

Re: qt: monolithic or modular?

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 01:59:04PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Efraim Flashner skribis: > > Actually I just checked ./configure --help again, and I can pass the > > flag '-nomake examples' and it shouldn't make the examples at all. I'm > > not sure how much compile time

Re: qt: monolithic or modular?

Efraim Flashner skribis: > Actually I just checked ./configure --help again, and I can pass the > flag '-nomake examples' and it shouldn't make the examples at all. I'm > not sure how much compile time it'll save, but it should save us the > 25MB of examples that we didn't

Re: qt: monolithic or modular?

Efraim Flashner skribis: > On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 02:15:07PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Efraim Flashner skribis: >> >> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:22:20AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: >> >> I try very hard to not build qt on my laptop,

Re: qt: monolithic or modular?

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 04:17:50PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 02:15:07PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Efraim Flashner skribis: > > > > > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:22:20AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > > >> I try very hard to not build

Re: qt: monolithic or modular?

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 02:15:07PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Efraim Flashner skribis: > > > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:22:20AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > >> I try very hard to not build qt on my laptop, mostly because of the long > >> build time (7 hours on

Re: qt: monolithic or modular?

Efraim Flashner skribis: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:22:20AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: >> I try very hard to not build qt on my laptop, mostly because of the long >> build time (7 hours on hydra [0]). Currently we download and use the big >> download of qt[1] and

Re: qt: monolithic or modular?

On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:22:20AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > I try very hard to not build qt on my laptop, mostly because of the long > build time (7 hours on hydra [0]). Currently we download and use the big > download of qt[1] and frankly I'd rather not. Qt does also ship in smaller >

Re: qt: monolithic or modular?

On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:22:20AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > I try very hard to not build qt on my laptop, mostly because of the long > build time (7 hours on hydra [0]). Currently we download and use the big > download of qt[1] and frankly I'd rather not. Qt does also ship in smaller >

Re: qt: monolithic or modular?

On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 11:38:18AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Efraim Flashner skribis: > > > I try very hard to not build qt > > on my laptop, mostly because of the long build time (7 hours on hydra > > [0]). Currently we download and use the big download of qt[1] and

Re: qt: monolithic or modular?

Efraim Flashner skribis: > I try very hard to not build qt > on my laptop, mostly because of the long build time (7 hours on hydra > [0]). Currently we download and use the big download of qt[1] and > frankly I'd rather not. Qt does also ship in smaller bits[2], 32 if I >

qt: monolithic or modular?

I try very hard to not build qt on my laptop, mostly because of the long build time (7 hours on hydra [0]). Currently we download and use the big download of qt[1] and frankly I'd rather not. Qt does also ship in smaller bits[2], 32 if I counted correctly. I propose we package the submodules