Tobias Geerinckx-Rice transcribed 672 bytes:
> Efraim, Guix,
>
> Efraim Flashner 写道：
> > tipp10 Debian continues to build with qt-4
>
> In cases like this one (where the software has been unmaintained for years),
> is the plan simply to remove them altogether?
>
> (Fine by me,)
>
> T G-R
As
Efraim,
Efraim Flashner 写道：
Seeing as Debian aparently still supports (most of) qt-4 it may
be
worth looking at how they do that.
Quite the opposite, actually: https://wiki.debian.org/Qt4Removal
Kind regards,
T G-R
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 09:48:36PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 09:17:02PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> > texmacs Debian dropped 2(?) versions ago
>
> I just added it during the Guile/Guix days at Strasbourg, please do not
> drop it... Also, it is a GNU project. It may
Am 15.07.19 um 20:54 schrieb Tobias Geerinckx-Rice:
> Efraim, Guix,
>
> Efraim Flashner 写道：
>> tipp10 Debian continues to build with qt-4
>
> In cases like this one (where the software has been unmaintained for
> years), is the plan simply to remove them altogether?
Why drop a package which is
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 09:17:02PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> texmacs Debian dropped 2(?) versions ago
I just added it during the Guile/Guix days at Strasbourg, please do not
drop it... Also, it is a GNU project. It may have been removed from Debian
because it depends on guile-1.8; but there
Efraim, Guix,
Efraim Flashner 写道：
tipp10 Debian continues to build with qt-4
In cases like this one (where the software has been unmaintained
for years), is the plan simply to remove them altogether?
(Fine by me,)
T G-R
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
./pre-inst-env guix refresh -l qt@4
Building the following 9 packages would ensure 11 dependent packages are
rebuilt: tipp10@2.1.0 qucs-s@0.0.20 lmms@1.1.3 poppler-qt4@0.72.0
avogadro@1.2.0 pybitmessage@0.6.3.2 mumble@1.2.19 texmacs@1.99.9 uim-qt@1.8.8
tipp10 Debian continues to build with qt-4
