On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:56:19 +0200
Efraim Flashner wrote:
> I checked 'guix refresh -l python2' and I got a list of the python2-*
> packages which are leaf packages. I'm not suggesting that we right now
> get rid of them, but it seems to me something worth keeping an eye on.
>
> 'guix package
Hi Konrad,
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 17:31, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
>
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> >> "My channel" doesn't exist (because I haven't yet found the time to
> >> figure out how to set up and manage a channel, although it's been on my
> >> to-do list for a while).
> >
> > I’d be happy to assist.
>
>
Efraim Flashner writes:
> I checked 'guix refresh -l python2' and I got a list of the python2-*
> packages which are leaf packages. I'm not suggesting that we right now
> get rid of them, but it seems to me something worth keeping an eye on.
>
> 'guix package -A ^python2- | wc -l' gave me 737
>
Konrad Hinsen transcribed 1.2K bytes:
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> >> "My channel" doesn't exist (because I haven't yet found the time to
> >> figure out how to set up and manage a channel, although it's been on my
> >> to-do list for a while).
> >
> > I’d be happy to assist.
>
> Thanks! I might come back
Hi Ricardo,
>> "My channel" doesn't exist (because I haven't yet found the time to
>> figure out how to set up and manage a channel, although it's been on my
>> to-do list for a while).
>
> I’d be happy to assist.
Thanks! I might come back to that offer when I find at least enough time
to figure
Dear,
Maybe I am wrong and I miss one point.
If you have local packages that depends on Guix packages, then it is
not a big issue when the Guix packages are removed. Because you just
have to `guix pull --commit=' where points to a Guix commit
owning the required packages.
And if I have correct,
Hi Konrad,
>> Konrad, going forward it might be reasonable to keep copies of required
>> Python 2 packages in your channel. We aren’t going to remove Python 2
>> packages now, but in the future we may not be able to fix unmaintained
>> packages and may have to remove them.
>
> "My channel"
Hi Ricardo,
> Konrad, going forward it might be reasonable to keep copies of required
> Python 2 packages in your channel. We aren’t going to remove Python 2
> packages now, but in the future we may not be able to fix unmaintained
> packages and may have to remove them.
"My channel" doesn't
Konrad Hinsen writes:
> Efraim Flashner writes:
>
>> I checked 'guix refresh -l python2' and I got a list of the python2-*
>> packages which are leaf packages. I'm not suggesting that we right now
>> get rid of them, but it seems to me something worth keeping an eye on.
>
> Please be careful
Efraim Flashner writes:
> I checked 'guix refresh -l python2' and I got a list of the python2-*
> packages which are leaf packages. I'm not suggesting that we right now
> get rid of them, but it seems to me something worth keeping an eye on.
Please be careful with "leaf packages". The leaves of
I checked 'guix refresh -l python2' and I got a list of the python2-*
packages which are leaf packages. I'm not suggesting that we right now
get rid of them, but it seems to me something worth keeping an eye on.
'guix package -A ^python2- | wc -l' gave me 737
the number of leaf python2 packages I
Hello everyone!
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 02:33:55PM +0100, Pjotr Prins wrote:
>> A lot of software outside Guix still depends on Python2, for better or
>> worse. I don't believe EOL means they are going to drop security
>> updates. Leaf packages may well be in use today.
>
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 11:38:12AM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
>> We're now about a year out from the official EOL for python2 (Jan 1,
>> 2020). So far we've been not adding python2 variants of packages that
>> are new unless they're actually needed for something. Do we
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 01:30:53PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Efraim Flashner writes:
> > We're now about a year out from the official EOL for python2 (Jan 1,
> > 2020). So far we've been not adding python2 variants of packages that
> > are new unless they're actually needed for something. Do
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 02:33:55PM +0100, Pjotr Prins wrote:
> A lot of software outside Guix still depends on Python2, for better or
> worse. I don't believe EOL means they are going to drop security
> updates. Leaf packages may well be in use today.
I do think it means that the current Python
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 11:38:12AM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> We're now about a year out from the official EOL for python2 (Jan 1,
> 2020). So far we've been not adding python2 variants of packages that
> are new unless they're actually needed for something. Do we want to
> start removing
On 26/12/2018 10:38, Efraim Flashner wrote:
We're now about a year out from the official EOL for python2 (Jan 1,
2020). So far we've been not adding python2 variants of packages that
are new unless they're actually needed for something. Do we want to
start removing python2 packages when updating
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 01:30:53PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Efraim Flashner writes:
>
> > We're now about a year out from the official EOL for python2 (Jan 1,
> > 2020). So far we've been not adding python2 variants of packages that
> > are new unless they're actually needed for something.
Efraim Flashner writes:
> We're now about a year out from the official EOL for python2 (Jan 1,
> 2020). So far we've been not adding python2 variants of packages that
> are new unless they're actually needed for something. Do we want to
> start removing python2 packages when updating other
We're now about a year out from the official EOL for python2 (Jan 1,
2020). So far we've been not adding python2 variants of packages that
are new unless they're actually needed for something. Do we want to
start removing python2 packages when updating other packages if they are
leaf packages?
--
20 matches
Mail list logo
