On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder why 'ant gen' didn't barf at me.
If you have duplicate definitions (or for that
matter), they'll get merged. This is used if you want to add stuff to
a module or project from within your workspace.
I know I've "used" that f
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rubys 2003/03/30 17:25:14
Modified:project avalon-excalibur.xml
Log:
Remove project definition which conflicts with cocoon's. Perhaps this
should be an installed package instead?
-
-
-
+1. I wonder why 'ant gen' didn't barf at
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Adam Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so I installed the package:
>
>
Did you provide a new module definition for slide or use the old one
(with and and all that)? What does your new definition
for slide look like (if you've written one)?
> In the project/jakar
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any Ant developers out there have a suggestion on how to get the
> following to fail instead of simply printing a warning:
>
> http://cvs.apache.org/builds/gump/2003-03-28/excalibur-component.html
Oh, it failed about eight months back an
rubys 2003/03/30 17:25:14
Modified:project avalon-excalibur.xml
Log:
Remove project definition which conflicts with cocoon's. Perhaps this
should be an installed package instead?
Revision ChangesPath
1.32 +0 -4 jakarta-gump/project/avalon-excalibur.xml
leosimons2003/03/30 11:54:00
Modified:project avalon-excalibur.xml
Log:
with monitor running its tests, I am further cleaning up and normalizing the builds.
I have enabled unit tests for some more builds.
Revision ChangesPath
1.31 +170 -62 jakarta-gump/project/av
rubys 2003/03/30 03:57:05
Modified:project rhino-cocoondev.xml
Log:
Tweak description
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +1 -1 jakarta-gump/project/rhino-cocoondev.xml
Index: rhino-cocoondev.xml
==
