Re: Going TLP -> finalize()

2004-02-10 Thread Nick Chalko
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Nick Chalko wrote: Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: http://www.hyperdictionary.com/dictionary/rationalization # [n] the organization of a business according to scientific principles of management in order to increase efficiency # [n] systematic organization; the act of orga

Re: Going TLP -> finalize()

2004-02-10 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Nick Chalko wrote: Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: http://www.hyperdictionary.com/dictionary/rationalization # [n] the organization of a business according to scientific principles of management in order to increase efficiency # [n] systematic organization; the act of organizing something accordin

Re: Going TLP -> finalize()

2004-02-10 Thread Nick Chalko
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: http://www.hyperdictionary.com/dictionary/rationalization # [n] the organization of a business according to scientific principles of management in order to increase efficiency # [n] systematic organization; the act of organizing something according to a system or a r

Re: Going TLP -> finalize()

2004-02-10 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Nick Chalko wrote: Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: RESOLVED, that the initial Gump PMC be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Jakarta PMC Gump subproject; and be it further What does "rationalization" mean ? http://www.hyperdictionary.com/dictionary/r

Re: Going TLP -> finalize()

2004-02-09 Thread Leo Simons
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Here is the board resolution ATM. Is it ok? +1 -- cheers, - Leo Simons --- Weblog -- http://leosimons.com/ IoC Component Glue -- http://jicarilla.org/ Articles & Opinions -- http://articles

Re: Going TLP -> finalize()

2004-02-09 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
> so, pseudo-pmc-ers, place your vote :-) Being out last week I wasn't able to keep up with the traffic of this, so don't really have information upon which to cast a vote. That said, I respect the folks who have, so have no objections... regards, Adam -

Re: Going TLP -> finalize()

2004-02-09 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 --- Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9 Feb 2004, at 06:26, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > > > > Here is the board resolution ATM. Is it ok? > > If yes, could Stefano please send it to the board ASAP so that they > > can vote on it in the next meeting? TIA > > > >WHE

Re: Going TLP -> finalize()

2004-02-09 Thread Scott Sanders
On Feb 9, 2004, at 8:27 AM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: so, pseudo-pmc-ers, place your vote :-) +1 Scott Sanders - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Going TLP -> finalize()

2004-02-09 Thread Nick Chalko
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: RESOLVED, that the initial Gump PMC be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Jakarta PMC Gump subproject; and be it further What does "rationalization" mean ? -

Re: Going TLP -> finalize()

2004-02-09 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004, Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here is the board resolution ATM. Is it ok? +1 > If yes, could Stefano please send it to the board ASAP so that they > can vote on it in the next meeting? The next board meeting is scheduled for the 18th, so the proposed resol

Re: Going TLP -> finalize()

2004-02-09 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: On 9 Feb 2004, at 06:26, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Here is the board resolution ATM. Is it ok? ... hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Gump PMC: * Adam Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Going TLP -> finalize()

2004-02-09 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
On 9 Feb 2004, at 06:26, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Here is the board resolution ATM. Is it ok? If yes, could Stefano please send it to the board ASAP so that they can vote on it in the next meeting? TIA WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Fou

Going TLP -> finalize()

2004-02-09 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Here is the board resolution ATM. Is it ok? If yes, could Stefano please send it to the board ASAP so that they can vote on it in the next meeting? TIA WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's