Re: Performance of gen.bat

2003-01-07 Thread dion
news <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/01/2003 08:38:15 AM: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > I've got cygwin in my PATH, and it has an echo.exe. I'm just renaming that > > to echo.old for a test run. > > What were the results? No difference. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: htt

Re: Performance of gen.bat

2003-01-07 Thread Sam Ruby
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got cygwin in my PATH, and it has an echo.exe. I'm just renaming that to echo.old for a test run. What were the results? - Sam Ruby -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Performance of gen.bat

2003-01-07 Thread Sam Ruby
Martin van den Bemt wrote: I have horrible preformance too.. A (complete) build takes about 6 hours or something :( gen.sh isn't too quick either.. Just using plain redhat 7.1 here.. If by complete build you mean gen+update+build all, that's not too far out of range, on my 2Ghz machine, this ta

Re: Performance of gen.bat

2003-01-07 Thread Martin van den Bemt
I have horrible preformance too.. A (complete) build takes about 6 hours or something :( gen.sh isn't too quick either.. Just using plain redhat 7.1 here.. Mvgr, Martin On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 05:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Ok, > > That's two of us with woeful performance? Any others? > -- > dI

Re: Performance of gen.bat

2003-01-06 Thread dion
Ok, That's two of us with woeful performance? Any others? -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog Work: http://www.multitask.com.au news <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/01/2003 03:25:02 PM: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > news <[EMAIL PROT

Re: Performance of gen.bat

2003-01-06 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: news <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/01/2003 02:23:26 AM: Wow it takes even longer on my box and mine is bigger than sams! Longer than 45 minutes? yes! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gen.bat on my system (P3 1Ghz, 512M memory) takes around 45 minutes to run.

Re: Performance of gen.bat

2003-01-06 Thread dion
news <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/01/2003 01:30:03 AM: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >>>perl map.pl ..\project\jakarta-avalon-site.xml > >> > >>On my machine, that takes 0.17 seconds. > > > > 0:00.20elapsed on mine. > > > > Ok, so the issue appears to be the echos? > > Weird. Easy enou

Re: Performance of gen.bat

2003-01-06 Thread Sam Ruby
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: perl map.pl ..\project\jakarta-avalon-site.xml On my machine, that takes 0.17 seconds. 0:00.20elapsed on mine. Ok, so the issue appears to be the echos? Weird. Easy enough to test... remove everything but the echos in publish.bat and rerun it against ..\project

Re: Performance of gen.bat

2003-01-06 Thread dion
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/01/2003 01:18:44 AM: [snip] > On my thinkpad, if I do this: > > > cd /D C:\gump\work>timex > > call publish ..\project\jakarta-avalon-site.xml C: > \jakarta\log\module_jakarta-avalon-site.html > > The elapsed time is 0.38 seconds. Furthermore, if I do

Re: Performance of gen.bat

2003-01-06 Thread dion
news <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/01/2003 02:23:26 AM: > Wow it takes even longer on my box and mine is bigger than sams! Longer than 45 minutes? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Gen.bat on my system (P3 1Ghz, 512M memory) takes around 45 minutes to > > run. > > > > On Sam's machine (spec

Re: Performance of gen.bat

2003-01-06 Thread dion
How long does the gen.sh/.bat take on your box? -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog Work: http://www.multitask.com.au Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/01/2003 10:34:05 PM: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Gen.bat on my sy

Re: Performance of gen.bat

2003-01-05 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
Wow it takes even longer on my box and mine is bigger than sams! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gen.bat on my system (P3 1Ghz, 512M memory) takes around 45 minutes to run. On Sam's machine (specs?) it takes 3 minutes. During the 'Publishing' step my machine maxes out on CPU and stays that way unti

Re: Performance of gen.bat

2003-01-05 Thread Sam Ruby
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gen.bat on my system (P3 1Ghz, 512M memory) takes around 45 minutes to run. On Sam's machine (specs?) it takes 3 minutes. P3 1133MHz, 1G RAM http://www5.pc.ibm.com/us/products.nsf/$wwwPartNumLookup/_26479ku During the 'Publishing' step my machine maxes out on CPU an

Re: Performance of gen.bat

2003-01-05 Thread Conor MacNeill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gen.bat on my system (P3 1Ghz, 512M memory) takes around 45 minutes to run. On Sam's machine (specs?) it takes 3 minutes. I'm running the ant build on Linux with my exec-scripts change. That all takes < 8 minutes on my slow Celeron 667, so there is some issue there.

Performance of gen.bat

2003-01-05 Thread dion
Gen.bat on my system (P3 1Ghz, 512M memory) takes around 45 minutes to run. On Sam's machine (specs?) it takes 3 minutes. During the 'Publishing' step my machine maxes out on CPU and stays that way until finished. As an example between - ..\project\jakarta-avalon-site.xml and - ..\project\jak