Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
I'd *really* appreciate feedback on these thoughts. If you only answer one
mail from me, please make it this one.
Couldn't get my head to answer you till now, sorry for the delay. It's a
pity that your Gump itch does not come at a time when I itch too ;-)
The topics are:
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
> [please vote:]
*Python Gump [as replacement]
+.5. +.5 means that I think its a good idea, would like to contribute,
but have no time to do so.
*Python Gump using Forrest
0. (though we shouldn't loose the immensely useful one-glance
red/yellow/white coloring)
*Gump Stati
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Adam R. B. Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A +0 at best,
which means "yes, but I won't/can't help".
There have quite been a few people on this list who apreciated a
Python rewrite a few months ago and I've never been among them. Just
wait for the others to chime in. 8-)
I really want answers from everybody, if at all possible, but even Stefan's
responses are enlightening. A +0 at best, almost a -1. Interesting, I wanted
a sanity check, maybe I'll get one here.
I guess I need to examine why would a rewite (forcing change) be wanted? I
think it needs to bring some
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Adam R. B. Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *Python Gump (as a future replacement for traditional Gump)
+0 as long as it can do everything that the "traditional" Gump can.
-1 otherwise.
I won't find the time to learn enough Python to jump into coding so I
can't be +1. I've
I'd *really* appreciate feedback on these thoughts. If you only answer one
mail from me, please make it this one. The topics are:
1) Sanity check on what I'm doing w/ Gump (or hoping to)
2) Internal Community
3) External community
First, I'd like to solicit some constructive feedback (and I'm not
