Hi,
I have a shapefile showing contours across a region.
Visual inspection of the vector data suggests that various subregions
have different aspects/bearings and slope.
Is there a way using gvSIG or any of its plugins to visualize or
categorize this data?
My desired output would be a polygon f
Jorge Gaspar Sanz Salinas wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 30/03/10 00:13, Gismael wrote:
>
>> Ben,
>>
>> getting funny questions answered in zero time is the most convincing reason
>> to consider os.
>>
>
> LoL
>
>
>> So after seeing our current sw provide
Gismael wrote:
> Ben,
>
> getting funny questions answered in zero time is the most convincing reason
> to consider os.
> So after seeing our current sw provider taking weeks of time answering
> serious questions, the fundamental direction is sorted out already.
>
> Without having gotten into detai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/03/10 00:13, Gismael wrote:
> Ben,
>
> getting funny questions answered in zero time is the most convincing reason
> to consider os.
LoL
> So after seeing our current sw provider taking weeks of time answering
> serious questions, the fundamen
Ben,
getting funny questions answered in zero time is the most convincing reason
to consider os.
So after seeing our current sw provider taking weeks of time answering
serious questions, the fundamental direction is sorted out already.
Without having gotten into details, I estimate that the spani
Hi Gismael
If you compare QGIS to gvSIG feature-wise, you will
probably find, like we at OA did, that gvSIG is by
far the more advanced and closest to "ArcView killer"
of any open source desktop GIS projects.
There are many strong open source GIS projects, but
none as complete when it comes to in
Guys,
I'm just a end user without programming skills or ambitions. But right now
I'm evaluating gvSIG vs. QGis for use in a real world productive
environment.
My proposal to change from GeoMedia to open source gave my bosses quite a
shiver. Monitoring this list without any insight but mere curios
- "Miguel Montesinos" wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> >De: gvsig_internacional-boun...@listserv.gva.es en nombre de Chris
> Puttick
> >Enviado el: lun 29/03/2010 15:27
> >Para: Users and Developers mailing list
> >Asunto: Re: [Gvsig_english] gvSIG 1.9.1
> >
> >- "Miguel Montesinos" wrote:
> >
>
Hey folks,
We're in spring, relax a little bit or someone will explode!! (in a
different way than GIS operation)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VnT7pT6zCcA
Jorge
___
Gvsig_internacional mailing list
Gvsig_internacional@listserv.gva.es
http://listserv.g
Hi Chris,
>De: gvsig_internacional-boun...@listserv.gva.es en nombre de Chris Puttick
>Enviado el: lun 29/03/2010 15:27
>Para: Users and Developers mailing list
>Asunto: Re: [Gvsig_english] gvSIG 1.9.1
>
>
>- "Miguel Montesinos" wrote:
>
>> Hi Ben,
>>
>> I'm not going into the origin of yo
El lun, 29-03-2010 a las 13:27 +, Chris Puttick escribió:
> - "Miguel Montesinos" wrote:
>
> > Hi Ben,
> >
> > I'm not going into the origin of your fork decission. I'm sure *both*
> > gvSIG and OA have made some communication mistakes. A direct
> > communication would have avoided forks
> > So here it goes:
> >
> > We just take the current gvSIG OADE 2010 sources,
> > fix the remaining 2 or 3 critical bugs and release
> > that as gvSIG 1.9.1!
> >
>
> To put things in place: are you proposing to abandon SVN repo in order
> to use... what?? Honestly, we are not going to aban
- "Miguel Montesinos" wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> I'm not going into the origin of your fork decission. I'm sure *both*
> gvSIG and OA have made some communication mistakes. A direct
> communication would have avoided forks and time and resource wasting.
> For sure at gvSIG we are pushing forward
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27/03/10 19:58, Benjamin Ducke wrote:
> Dear devs
>
Hi Ben, all.
> OK, here is a suggestion for gvSIG 1.9.1.
> It may sound radical, but it could be a good
> solution for everyone involved. You have all
> Sunday to think about it ;-)
>
> So here
Hi again,
I'm curious about one aspect
Benjamin Ducke wrote:
>>> We just take the current gvSIG OADE 2010 sources,
>>> fix the remaining 2 or 3 critical bugs and release
>>> that as gvSIG 1.9.1!
>>>
As far as I know, gvSIG 1.9.1 will be a release of the trunk of gvSIG's
svn. Becau
OK, I'll make a note on my Mac TODO list.
Cheers,
Ben
- Original Message -
From: "Agustin Diez Castillo"
To: "Users and Developers mailing list"
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 2:49:57 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern /
Rome / Stockholm / Vienna
Subject: Re: [Gvsig_english] gvSIG
On Mar 29, 2010, at 2:33 PM, Benjamin Ducke wrote:
> - provide a Mac OS X version (possible with a few weeks delay)
Good to hear it. The current Ai2 version is working good enough for me but
sextante 0.6 in it will be a plus. In the Ai2 version I get into trouble with
large (+2 Gb) ecw files a
>
> > We just take the current gvSIG OADE 2010 sources,
> > fix the remaining 2 or 3 critical bugs and release
> > that as gvSIG 1.9.1!
>
> It makes sense if we skip the stabilization process. The problem is:
> Do we skip it? If so, can we call it a stable version? If not, who is
> going to
Hi Ben,
I'm not going into the origin of your fork decission. I'm sure *both* gvSIG and
OA have made some communication mistakes. A direct communication would have
avoided forks and time and resource wasting. For sure at gvSIG we are pushing
forward for external developers to come in the projec
19 matches
Mail list logo
