Well, just as a last word of mine in this thread :
My original question actually only was if the "copy layer" result (at least
as long as I use it for a shape file layer) is a bug or is intention. The
answer is: it is intended to work like this. I may like it or not. One can
think of hundreds of e
Hello,
I'm a newcomer to gvSIG too and had the same problem. I would like to
see what those in the know say about this.
I eventually got a successful installation but I'm not sure which of the
following did the trick:
I uninstalled gvSIG
Uninstalled all the java I could find.
Ran CCleaner th
Hi Steven --
I am afraid these are several distinct issues.
You will not be able to get the Publisher extension
to run on the current version of gvSIG, because
it has not been updated for gvSIG 1.10/11/12 yet
(as far as I know). The error message you get from
the installer is bogus.
Regarding 32/
Hi all,
now you guys made me think about copying features, files, objects. Puuh.
Let's stick with the copy text example.
If you will, copying a piece of text within a text document is like copying
a feature within any layer (sic!), which you can do with the nice extension
*copy&paste features* whi
Hello Wolfgang,
On 03/08/11 13:31, Wolfgang Qual wrote:
> http://forge.osor.eu/plugins/wiki/index.php?id=194&type=g
> Some additional CAD tools for editing geometries. Some functions are new
> but: has anyone tested it on the latest version of gvSIG?
>
Yep, it works like a charm in gvSIG 1.11 :)
Hello,
I'm very new to gvSIG and not sure if my question has been addressed
elsewhere already. My apologies if it has. The short question is how to
install Publisher on 1.11 or if it is even possible. The details of my
recent attempt are below.
I believe gvSIG 1.11.0 was correctly installed on m
Sorry again, Ben: there was no "uncertainty" of mine what a shape file is and
how it relates to physical data on the disk. To me you just argue like not
wanting to understand or just not want to move away from your point of view.
You may stay where you are, so do I...
Cheers
Klaus
--
View this m
Sorry, I was getting a bit carried away, as I felt
that the discussion was drifting towards general
aspects gvSIG's GUI design. In my view, Klaus'
original problem was caused by some uncertainty
about what a layer really is in gvSIG, and how it
relates to the actual physical data on the disk,
not s
On 03/08/11 17:31, Benjamin Ducke wrote:
> For these reasons, I am not a believer in masking the
> de facto complexity of GIS with a GUI, either. Sooner
> or later, that approach is bound to backfire.
Benjamin,
I can't understand how you perceive improving a GUI interface so that
the function th
That's right.
See you
Jose
>José,
>you meant that link, isn't it?
>--> http://forge.osor.eu/plugins/wiki/index.php?NavTableForms&id=122&type=g
>Best,
>Wolfgang
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/Interesting-extensions-has-anyone-tested-them-tp6648379p664854
José,
you meant that link, isn't it?
--> http://forge.osor.eu/plugins/wiki/index.php?NavTableForms&id=122&type=g
Best,
Wolfgang
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/Interesting-extensions-has-anyone-tested-them-tp6648379p6648541.html
Sent from the gvSIG users m
Another interesting extension: NavTableForms (I've just copied the email that
Andres has sent today to the navtableform list).
Kind regards
Jose
--
José Antonio Canalejo Alonso
CSGIS
Email:jose.canal...@csgis.de
Web: http://www.csgis.de
*
Hi devs,
I've just clean up the navtable w
We tested Open CAD Tools and show them at the last gvSIG User Meeting in
Salzburg. They are quite good!
Kind regards
Jose
--
José Antonio Canalejo Alonso
CSGIS
Email:jose.canal...@csgis.de
Web: http://www.csgis.de
Dear list,
I just discovered two more exten
Dear list,
I just discovered two more extensions in the jungle of the world wide web.
http://forge.osor.eu/plugins/wiki/index.php?id=194&type=g
Some additional CAD tools for editing geometries. Some functions are new
but: has anyone tested it on the latest version of gvSIG?
* Fonsagua
http://ca
Hi,
It was a wrong guess then. xs:short was a problem with iGeoDesktop and Kosmo
when using my own TinyOWS WFS server. GvSIG is reading the whole layers OK but
there are some still not analysed problems with attribute and spatial filter.
I will try to find time to dig deeper with the problem
Hi Jukka.
The error is a programming error (a casting exception). The gvSIG WFS
client is not based on deegree, at least not the 1.11 version. The
xs:short type should be supported.
> By the way, it would be good to let user select lower WFS version than the
> maximum supported by the server.
Having been part of several GIS development
teams in the past, and having trained people with
a diversity of educational backgrounds, skills and
job requirements on GIS, I have often seen these
kinds of problems. GIS terminology seems counter-intuitive
some times and it is also not consistently app
Hi,
I made a couple of tests. GvSIG is sending the GetFeature request for the [2]
as well and server is sending the GML back. However, the result is not parsed.
I suppose this is because there are attributes like this in the layer schema:
I suppose gvSIG WFS is based on deegree and deegree
Hi Simon
If you come from an ArcView 3.x background (as I do), then GvSIG behaves in a
similar manner (both in terms of layers and the Project Manager). Copy merely
copied the layer in the View, not the underlying Shapefile.
I think later versions of ArcMap also allow you to have multiple la
Hello Klaus,
the problem you had is one of the most common ones for people beginning with
gvSIG (and other Desktop GIS like ArcView 3 or ArcGIS). Maybe we should give it
a try and thinking about the possibility to rename this functionality.
Kind regards
Jose
--
José Antonio Canalejo Alonso
CSGI
Hello,
I am having further problems with the 3D installation. The installation ran
successfully but when I open the gvSIG desktop, the 2
new additional views do not show. Can you advise on what to do here please?
Kind regards
Melanie
Melanie Hutton
GIS/Technical Support
Telephone: +44 (0)28
Hello Ernesto.
I've checked it and thats true, it is a bug. I've had a look to the
source code and I've found the solution. Could you please open a ticket
with the bug [1] and send us the link? I will attach a file with the
solution? If we follow this procedure next gvSIG version will include
22 matches
Mail list logo
