Hi Aaron,
Precisely, the reason why I said it depended on which one we are talking
about. I did not read Chips copy until after sending you my thoughts. What he
copied is exactly what I had read. Having the file object may come in handy for
deleting a file as Dave wants, maybe as I had show
Hi Aaron,
I was looking at the same thing inside the Simple Dialog explanation in the
Tool Kit. For it does state there in the old version I had before your last
change that even objects can be placed on the data list. But, I have not done a
test to see if will add objects; Dave's error.
Right. I think there's some confusion between the Toolkit's
ListBoxDialog object, and the standard ListBox object in Window-Eyes.
The SimpleDialogs shared object does allow you to store objects with
list view items (using the shared object's AddItem method) because it
stores the values in an i
Aaron,
below is the text from the addItem method of the simpleDialogs object. I
believe it shows the point Bruce was also trying to make regarding the data
item being clearly said to be an object?
---
Navigation:
GW Micro App Toolkit
>
Objects
>
SimpleDialogs
>
Methods
>
AddItem
Previou
Hi David,
If you did not use the sort feature of the simple dialog, then this would be
possible for you to manage yourself. you could keep a list of what's in the
listbox, and when something is returned, you could look it's position up in
your list. then after you delete it, and reload the simpl
Howdy,
I was referring to the Data property of a ListBox control.
I believe that David was handling the delete on his own, but wanted the
control to then re-select the next item. That may be beyond what a
"simple" dialog is for, but I'll put it on my request list.
Aaron
On 12/2/2011 9:02 AM
Hi Aaron,
It states it can be an object in the data statement inside the Tool Kit
list of objects and properties explanation.
Also says use the set command for an object that is placed inside the data
of The list.
If that is wrong then you will have to change your methods for that
Chip,
It's a variant, because the value can be either text or a number. But it
can't be an object.
Aaron
On 11/30/2011 8:12 PM, Chip Orange wrote:
Hi Aaron,
Please see the below; it's copied from the app developer's ref manual, and
is why I thought "variant" meant it was ok to store additio
