that
you like better? C#, perhaps?
-Original Message-
From: Doug Geoffray [mailto:geoff...@gwmicro.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 3:17 PM
To: gw-scripting@gwmicro.com
Subject: Re: Shared Data Implementation
Dave,
You get to the toolkit's help by going to the Window-Eyes
Now since you mentioned higher-level languages, why not use one that you like
better? C#, perhaps?
-Original Message-
From: Doug Geoffray [mailto:geoff...@gwmicro.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 3:17 PM
To: gw-scripting@gwmicro.com
Subject: Re: Shared Data Implementation
Dave
Dave,
You get to the toolkit's help by going to the Window-Eyes Apps menu,
going to the GW Toolkit option and opening it up. The first option in
that pulldown is help, so select that. A dialog comes up with the
"Launch Help" button selected by default. Hit enter and you are in the
Windows
Thank you very much, Aaron! Now, if I could find the documentation on
GWToolkit... I find the GW Micro Object model info in the
documentation option of the WE control panel's help menu, but I don't
find GWToolkit on AppCentral. Of course, I find the toolkit script
info, but it does not seem lik
On 2/21/2012 1:08 PM, Aaron Smith wrote:
In addition, each app that does use your shared object will get their
own copy to avoid inter-app mingling.
I left out an important part that makes the previous sentence true. If
you want everyone to have their own copy of the object, you have to
share
David,
You can mimic what the GW Toolkit does: instantiate copies of classes as
objects, and share them through the SharedObjects object.
For example, perhaps you have a set of functions that you use in almost
every app you develop. You would start by creating a global app that
contains a cl
Hello, Colleagues,
I am designing two related apps that are viewed as two different
scripts, but, they share common data elements (constants and arrays,
and even a couple of routines.) If I were doing this in a high level
programming language, I'd seriously consider making a class with the
two
