Sharon Wrote:
Now, Brown would be blameless in this -- like George Lucas is
blameless for those few who really think there is a galaxy far, far
away where Ewoks lived -- if he didn't himself actively encourage
people to misuse his novel by claiming the "history" in it really is
true.
*
I agree. And actually, if anyone is in Austin and part of the
classics department there is a private library downstairs that has
copies of these and many many many other books.
Truthfully though, I have the book and the cd. Read it, listened to
it. I did not see anywhere in or on the book any refe
> I haven't read said book of this discussion, but I have read "The Last
> > >Just curious, when did Dan Brown claim to DaVinci Code was true.
I did read the Da Vinci Code, not a bad airport novel but too wound up in it's
own mythology, I thought.
The Jesus-had-decendants theory has been around
>
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 7:25 PM
Subject: [h-cost] DaVinci Code & Claims of Truth (was: h-costume Digest, Vol
5, Issue 358)
> At 10:58 AM -0700 4/27/06, Onaree Berard wrote:
> >Just curious, when did Dan Brown claim to DaVinci Code was true.
>
> He has repeatedly asserte
At 10:58 AM -0700 4/27/06, Onaree Berard wrote:
Just curious, when did Dan Brown claim to DaVinci Code was true.
He has repeatedly asserted that although the main characters and the
specific plot involving them are fictitious, the background "history"
is true (not only the marriage and offspr
