RE: [h-cost] sizing/quality of clothing

2006-02-27 Thread Sharon at Collierfam.com
to Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 11:05 PM To: Historical Costume Subject: RE: [h-cost] sizing/quality of clothing In my family the problem with the pants is the thigh area. That is where the fat or muscle goes first. If you get pants to fit the waist your thighs have to be poured into the legs. If you

Re: [h-cost] sizing/quality of clothing

2006-02-27 Thread Catherine Olanich Raymond
On Monday 27 February 2006 2:04 am, otsisto wrote: > In my family the problem with the pants is the thigh area. That is where > the fat or muscle goes first. If you get pants to fit the waist your thighs > have to be poured into the legs. If you get pants that fit the thighs, the > waist is to big

RE: [h-cost] sizing/quality of clothing

2006-02-27 Thread otsisto
In my family the problem with the pants is the thigh area. That is where the fat or muscle goes first. If you get pants to fit the waist your thighs have to be poured into the legs. If you get pants that fit the thighs, the waist is to big and you have to belt them tight to stay on and the fabric b

Re: [h-cost] sizing/quality of clothing

2006-02-26 Thread Penny Ladnier
Sandy, I hear you girl! I wear a 14 or 16 depending on the cut. I am 5' 10". I have been buying men's pants and shirts for years. You can dress them up to make them look feminine. Women's pants are too short in length and the sleeves are too short. The other day I heard on a fashion sho