Perfect :-)
On Apr 5, 2009, at 1:54 PM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Hi,
I still have to
think (guess) that remote connection is not possible in
auto_server=true
mode since in your last sentence is says that the process needs to
have
access to the database file, which is not the case from a rem
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for your quick reply!
We 'll upgrade to the latest version. And if it does happen in the
future, we 'll use the recover tool first.
Thanks!
Peter
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2
Maybe it was not closed properly. Can you try Channel implementation?
Jan
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Thomas Mueller
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> There is a problem though: I could not connect to a previous database
>> created with jdbc:h2:.. using jdbc:h2:nioMapped:... Is it normal? Is
>> so, do yo
We had the same issue some time ago on the older version of H2
See
http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database/browse_thread/thread/ee669f2d2bd211b1/565f05257287c514?lnk=gst&q=a701440#565f05257287c514
The only way we could recover was to recreate the index on the latest
version of H2 (at the time
Hi,
I found the problem. It's quite serious, and I will create a new
release later this week.
Queries that are ordered by an indexed column returned no rows in
certain cases (if all rows were deleted from the table previously, and
there is a low number of rows in the table, and when not using ot
Hi,
in H2 1.1.110 (2009-04-03) - given this setup:
create table "M_1" ( "d1" int, "d2" int, VALUE DOUBLE);
create table "M_2" ( "d1" int, "d2" int, VALUE DOUBLE);
create table "D" ( "id" int);
the following select statement fails (with a "Column D1.ID not
found"):
SELECT "m1"."VALUE" + "m2"."
