I have developed a web service that I'm running in WebSphere
application server. I want to test a method that simply retrieves all
values from a database table and returns them as part of a payload in
a response. I want to use an in-memory database for testing so the
tests will be easily
Hi,
Did you already read the documentation at
http://h2database.com/html/advanced.html#transaction_isolation ? The
documentation is not complete, I will add:
= Read Committed =
Read locks are released immediately after executing the statement, but
write locks are kept until the transaction
Hi,
I need to backup my embedded database online (while server is
running). The database version is 1.1.117 and it is running in MVCC
mode. As far as I understand I can't use SCRIPT SQL statement because
it provides transactionally inconsistent backup in case of MVCC mode.
Please confirm my
Are you saying that your test and your webservice need to talk to the same
database? In that case, don't you need to need to use similar connection
strings.
Instead of jdbc:h2:mem: + DATABASE_NAME
Try this: jdbc:h2:tcp://localhost/mem: + DATABASE_NAME
Seems plausible to me -- but I haven't
Kerry,
I don't really need to use a database in the testcase. I just wanted
to make 100% certain that the database still existed after closing the
connection in the set up method (and it does). I do want to use that
same database in the web service and I do use the tcp://localhost in
that url.
Hi,
I have a need to take a user-supplied SQL query and perform a few
modifications to it before allowing it to execute against the
database. Mostly, this consists of injecting in extra field names and
conditions. I need this to be transparent to the user because the user
cannot be relied on
Hi,
Hi all, i have some torubles to connect to my tcp remote server.
I'm starting server with this command
java -cp h2-1.2.136.jar org.h2.tools.Server -tcpAllowOthers
Now im trying to connect to this server from a pc in LAN, my url is
this
jdbc:h2:tcp://192.168.0.2:9092/C:\h2db
But i
Hi,
Is it recommended to enable the MVCC
parameter with an in-memory h2 database?
It's possible, but usually it's not required.
Does it provide any performance advantages?
It depends on your use case. Why don't you try it?
What is your recommendation at this point?
I suggest to try it
I did some more testing -- it looks like your machine can't resolve
localhost (don't laugh -- it happens!)
I get the same error as you if I try to connect to the following:
jdbc:h2:tcp://UNKNOWN_HOST/mem:testing;IFEXISTS=TRUE
Cheers
Kerry
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Calcul8r
Can you client machine connect to the server machine via telnet?
telnet 192.168.0.2 9092
Does this fail immediately, or does it connect?
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:36 AM, blow all...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all, i have some torubles to connect to my tcp remote server.
I'm starting server with
The use case is to allow 3rd parties access to the same database, but
to isolate the records that belong to each party automatically in each
table (without their knowledge). When they create a table, extra
fields are added that identifies the party and a few other things.
When they execute an
11 matches
Mail list logo