It will be 2. and the second create table will fail because the table
already exists. But I don't see how that has anything to do with being
thread safe? The in memory database is per process, so all threads
access the same database. If you want a separate database per thread
then give the data
On Tuesday, October 8, 2013 10:24:12 AM UTC-7, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>
> I think the documentation is quite clear.
>
Let me rephrase the question (and sorry for just now noticing the timely
reply):
Suppose I have two threads, t1 and t2. Suppose each of them opens a
connection to jdbc:h2:mem:
Hello,
This issue happened again. The database was recovered with the recovery
tool and was working fine for a few days. I am seeing an array index out
of bounds exception.
Stack trace:
SELECT * FROM MRKMAGDTA.FMTSPF80 WHERE FMNAM = 'SHLBL131' AND FMMODL =
'ZTZ170XI3' [5-162]
at org.h2.m
