Hello.
That's not possible.
Why you need a HashMap inside of MVMap? I think you should create a
separate MVMap for user_accounts content, in this case you can simply put
the modified object into it and only that object will be serialized.
--
You received this message because you are
On 1) Assume that there are 10 UserData objects in the map. If one
UserData object's data members are modified, the only way I know to save
the modified UserData object is calling
data_store.put("user_accounts", user_accounts);
again. The problem is that all 10 UserData objects will