Forgot one:
try multi threading, e. g. populating one prepared statement while
another is executed/written.
Not guaranteed if this really will be faster though.
On Fri, 2024-01-12 at 15:38 +0700, Andreas Reichel wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> On Fri, 2024-01-12 at 00:17 -0800, mche...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings.
On Fri, 2024-01-12 at 00:17 -0800, mche...@gmail.com wrote:
> hi. I am running AMD 3900x with 128GB ram and a nvme ssd. Now i can
> insert 1xk record per seconds, which is very fast. But how can I make
> is 10 times more? what hardware can do that?
1) Ensure that all Indexes and constr
hi. I am running AMD 3900x with 128GB ram and a nvme ssd. Now i can insert
1xk record per seconds, which is very fast. But how can I make is 10 times
more? what hardware can do that?
thanks
Peter
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2
Database" group.
thanks all
On Wednesday 10 January 2024 at 09:38:59 UTC+8 Andrei Tokar wrote:
> Apparently, you assumption about "In-mem should be much faster" is not
> correct.
> It just makes me wonder, what exactly is the problem at hand? Is that the
> disk-based database is too fast?
> Or there is an expec