On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 06:52, Alex Ramos wrote:
> I've come down to a decision-point with three choices... 1) reimplement
> MVStore abstraction, 2) reimplement filesystem abstraction used by MVStore,
> or 3) implement pluggable tables, one layer up.
>
>
>
MVStore is a "transactional key-value
Hi Alex,
thank you for the explanation.
On Sat, 2021-04-24 at 11:59 -0700, Alex Ramos wrote:
> - But I don't like database servers.
> - So my idea is to move to embedded H2 with cloud backing store and
> get rid of the database servers, while keeping SQL, JDBC,
> JdbcTemplate, and Hibernate.
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for asking. I realized I have some unstated goals. Here are my
thoughts:
On Saturday, April 24, 2021 at 12:22:30 AM UTC-7
and...@manticore-projects.com wrote:
>
> a) mount the cloud storage per SSHFS and access the normal DB file
>
This configuration would still retain
Greetings.
On Fri, 2021-04-23 at 21:43 -0700, Alex Ramos wrote:
> The end-goal is the ability to instantiate an "embedded" h2 that uses
> "dumb" (NoSQL) cloud storage to persist the data and index B-Trees,
> while retaining the full RDBMS SQL capability of the upper layers.
Pardon my dumb
Hi All,
I'm investigating the possibility of using an external key-value store as
the backing store for h2 db. Imagine something like Redis, memcache, or
DynamoDB, as an alternative to the current two choices if in-memory vs
filesystem storage. The end-goal is the ability to instantiate an
