Lets put it in the book then :)
-Zack
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ka-Ping Yee
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10:43 PM
To: Neil Drumm
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [developers] SignUpGoodAt page obsoleted
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Neil D
Q: What would go on the announcments list?
I also think a graphics / theming list might be useful (no?).
There was also talk of a MetaDean list and a Deanster list. What do you
guys think?
-Zack
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Neil Drumm wrote:
> We can have mailing lists off of deanspace.org. Here is m
We can have mailing lists off of deanspace.org. Here is my thinking for the lists:
announce: announce from americansfordean.com
deanspace: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
devel: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or we can start using the forum.module which was modded to send email.
Zack/Josh: I need addresses or whatever to
> Wiki or Book: I started doing things as books. I haven't played
> with a wiki module for Drupal. Is there one? I will load it and
> play with it and provide my comments. I do like the idea of Wiki for
> quickly changing things and books for something more permanent. I
> also like the idea o
And when you have MT modules ready for testing I have an MT sandbox up and
running, as I'm sure many other people here do. Please let us know and
we'll kick the tires.
Aldon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of zachary rosen
Sent: Thursday, July
Transparency: I vote for letting lurkers be anonymous. Although it does
come back to my earlier question: Is there any nice way to make particular
posts only readable by a certain set of users. Personally, I would even
allow anonymous people to post. If they post anything unappropriate, the
ad
I have been busy with other project lately myself and
have been hanging back like Dave, but this is
something I thought I should really speak up on.
I know the idea is to make it "easy" for people to use
the kit and get their sites up and running in no time.
I installed a drupal test site a while
MT module is something we have been talking about doing for quite some
time. By all means Dave - run with it, it will get a lot of use I am
sure.
-Zack
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Zephyr Teachout wrote:
> Dave et al --
>
> As I said last night in the chat, I think the modules will be the most
> heavil
Dave et al --
As I said last night in the chat, I think the modules will be the most
heavily used part of this -- already tech-savvy groups will want to hook
into aspects, but not all, of this service. In fact, I think introducing
the service as module or site will vastly increase the likelihood o
Hello all
I've been onboard since early on, basically lurking and following the
email exchanges. But I'm glad that Josh S. has brought back the idea of
non-Drupal modules. I suggested a while back that there be an MT module
for bloggers, to put into a sidebar. I think that if we reach out to some
Yes...
But you proposed a new descision :)
Should we differentiate (through authentication) between non developers
who are active in the community - and active developers?
I.E. give lurkers less rights than participants? I am leaning yes - but
what do you guys think?
-Zack
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003
Right, authenticated to submit anything except comments. And different levels of
authentication:
Anonymous: Read and comment
Authenicated: more privileges, but not a lot
Developer: All of us, submit just about anything and probably some editing
Admin: Admin, editing.
-Neil
Original message
Submit things - as in be active in development conversations. This means
using the communication tools, posting blog entries, etc. Depending on
what we do with the CVS (keep SF or set up out own tree) we can handle
code submission authentication in the same way.
-Zack
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, CMR w
> Yes this makes sense to me - but i think they should be authenticated
> before they can submit things. Comments?
>
Submit content, as in posts, blogs, profiles, endorsements.. right? not
scripts/code etc.. I haven't seen any specs indicating we 're inviting folks
to submit the latter (at this s
Yes this makes sense to me - but i think they should be authenticated
before they can submit things. Comments?
-Zack
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Neil Drumm wrote:
> Right now we are kinda opaque. People have to sign up to see whats going on. I can
> do whatever with the Drupal permissions or even use
Right now we are kinda opaque. People have to sign up to see whats going on. I can do
whatever with the Drupal permissions or even use a second instance of Drupal for our
internal communicaion. Are we okay with letting our lurkers be anonymous? I plan on
letting them have privileges to view most
I missed last night's meeting...sorry but I'm a day behind. uhm...what year is this?? ;)
My (too many) thoughts.
IMO DeanSpace (or whatever it will be called...I have NO clue)...the "kit" people will download and install.will be a godsend for many with existing sites (have you se
I think Josh has an extremely important point here. I am currently
developing the Connecticut for Dean site. (You can see a draft at
http://ahynes1.homeip.net:8180/ct2, any comments would be welcome). The
site is based on the Texas site (http://www.deanfortexas.com). Our go-live
date is schedul
A few comments from my side. First, I'm sorry I had to idle when you got
around to talking about migrating Wikki to DeanSpace. I don't know the
particulars of my schedule this weekend. I have to spend some time with
kids and grandparents, etc.
However, the goal of Porting the Wikki starting som
>>Just a quick note and two questions on themes:
>>2) Are you (any of you) open to "requests" for themes?
Yeah, there's already been a request by someone on this list to alter adc (I think it's called - which I've yet to even look at). I've been dealing with my own theme wish list here. I'm sur
20 matches
Mail list logo
