On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 20:52:05 +0200
Quentin Rameau wrote:
>
I second this patch. As a side-note, this patch is necessary and gives
the ground work for a patch by me that drops privileges after the getpw
function.
Previously on OpenBSD, slock would _never_ drop privileges, which is
not a very sane
eprint() is not declared in ii, be careful.
Raiz
diff --git a/ii.c b/ii.c
index a32326d..51318aa 100644
--- a/ii.c
+++ b/ii.c
@@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
#ifdef __OpenBSD__ /* OpenBSD pledge(2) support */
if (pledge("stdio rpath wpath cpat
Hi,
* Ali H. Fardan [2016-09-04 20:40]:
> Sorry, I can't quote your last message because I accidently deleted
> it. anyways, as far as I know __OpenBSD__ is either defined by the compiler
> (in openbsd) or the openbsd libc, so if the code being compiled under
> openbsd __OpenBSD__ will be defined.
commit 584290f2642eeacbe1b24e7174e49139d6787252
Author: Nico Golde
AuthorDate: Tue Sep 6 19:58:28 2016 +0200
Commit: Nico Golde
CommitDate: Tue Sep 6 19:58:28 2016 +0200
use pledge by default if compiled on openbsc and provide errno string
diff --git a/config.mk b/config.mk
index 2c
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 12:41 AM, FRIGN wrote:
> but this only happens if you typedef your structs, which I think is bad
> practice.
> If you do a
> #typedef struct hw homework
> this is your own fault. Using
> sizeof(struct hw)
> shows clearly it's a type, whereas
> sizeof(
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 11:35 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> See http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/WG14/www/docs/n1256.pdf 6.5.3
> for unary operator specification of the C language.
6.5.3 shows (the relevant parts)
unary-expression:
postfix-expression
sizeof unary-expression
siz
> I think using goto loops sometimes is good, depend on the use case.
Obviously
> For example in spt.c:
>
> run:
> notify_send(timers[i].cmt);
>
> for (timecount = 0; timecount < timers[i].tmr; timecount +=
> inc) sleep(1);
>
> if (++i >= LEN(timers)) i = 0; /* i infinal
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 09:55:49AM +0200, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
On 5 September 2016 at 09:52, FRIGN wrote:
On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 09:48:34 +0200
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
Using typedefs destroys this beautiful hierarchy.
Beware! There have been zealots arguing that using goto is a bad
practice for s
