Re: [hackers] [dwm] [PATCH] make OOM on new client non-fatal

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:38 PM, Markus Teich wrote: >> >>> I can at least imagine cases where quitting on allocation failure is not >> >>> good. For example dwm is running, a new client starting up, but there is >> >>> no memory left for the client struct. In this

[hackers] [dwm] [PATCH] make OOM on new client non-fatal

--- > >>> I can at least imagine cases where quitting on allocation failure is not > >>> good. For example dwm is running, a new client starting up, but there is > >>> no memory left for the client struct. In this case dwm should just print > >>> an error, but not quit to give the user the

Re: [hackers] [dwm] [PATCH] decouple color-scheme count from dwm.c

Heyho Anselm, Markus Teich wrote: > this patch allows for a flexible amount of different colorschemes in config.h > without having to edit dwm.c as well. > This patch simplifies the status bar text padding and fixes the comment with a > wrong description. I think enough time has passed for