On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 17:52:35 +0100
"Roberto E. Vargas Caballero" wrote:
Dear Roberto,
> Your oppinion is irrelevant, I don't accept sugestions form fanboys.
> This is not about security, it is about writing suckless code that
> can be understood easily, that can be maintained easily and it is
>
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:19:32AM +0200, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> Adding ifdefs of course is a tough decision in any case, though I
> always think that suckless tools should be really more tuned towards
> OpenBSD as it really is probably the most suckless operating system
> around.
You are wrong,
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:19:32AM +0200, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 09:36:29 +0200
> Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
>
> Dear Hiltjo,
>
> > I think you have a good point. Maybe we should revert the pledge(2)
> > changes and put them on the wiki. The patches could be maintained
> >
On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 09:36:29 +0200
Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
Dear Hiltjo,
> I think you have a good point. Maybe we should revert the pledge(2)
> changes and put them on the wiki. The patches could be maintained
> separately and added to the OS ports.
>
> What is the community opinion about this?
> > […] All these
> > patches must go to the patches section and not in the main
> > repo.
>
> I think you have a good point. Maybe we should revert the pledge(2) changes
> and
> put them on the wiki. The patches could be maintained separately and added to
> the OS ports.
>
> What is the
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 08:20:38AM +0100, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 08:14:25PM -0300, Gleydson Soares wrote:
> > the following patch brings support for OpenBSD's unveil(2) mechanism for
> > ii.
>
> Guys, we should stop sending this kind of patches. If we begin
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 08:14:25PM -0300, Gleydson Soares wrote:
> the following patch brings support for OpenBSD's unveil(2) mechanism for
> ii.
Guys, we should stop sending this kind of patches. If we begin to
fill all the suckless projects with #ifdef __OpenBSD__, why do we not
fill them with
