On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 22:30:43 -0700
Michael Forney wrote:
Dear Michael,
> Thanks for investigating this, Laslo. Your findings seem to match my
> quick experimentation, and at this point I am leaning towards sticking
> with ARGBEGIN/ARGEND, but using a simpler implementation like the one
> I shared
On 2019-06-30, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> What do the others think?
Thanks for investigating this, Laslo. Your findings seem to match my
quick experimentation, and at this point I am leaning towards sticking
with ARGBEGIN/ARGEND, but using a simpler implementation like the one
I shared or the one you
On 2019-07-01, Anselm Garbe wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 at 20:21, wrote:
>> +++ b/.gitignore
>> @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
>> +*.o
>> +/getconf.h
>> +/libutf.a
>> +/libutil.a
> [..]
>
> I suggest:
>
> *
> !*.c
> !*.h
> gitconf.h
>
> or something along those lines. Then you don't need to main
On 2019-07-01, David Demelier wrote:
> I think the Makefile rule is redundant and keeping just the .gitignore
> could be enough. Because to me a project/code/application should not
> know which SCM it is based on. That's also why I personnally exclude
> SCMs bits from distributions files (includin
Hi there,
On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 at 20:21, wrote:
> +++ b/.gitignore
> @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
> +*.o
> +/getconf.h
> +/libutf.a
> +/libutil.a
[..]
I suggest:
*
!*.c
!*.h
gitconf.h
or something along those lines. Then you don't need to maintain all
the cruft and can also get rid of this Makefile rule.
Le 30/06/2019 à 05:20, g...@suckless.org a écrit :
commit 9ae6c45097e48de66219366f1c55bc4eb01adc7f
Author: Michael Forney
AuthorDate: Thu Jun 13 13:52:52 2019 -0700
Commit: Michael Forney
CommitDate: Fri Jun 28 00:10:10 2019 -0700
Add .gitignore
Also, add rule to regene
