[hackers] [dwm] Revert "do not call signal-unsafe function inside sighanlder" || Hiltjo Posthuma

commit e03248a4d5feaaacb130416be6e467a04de81f78 Author: Hiltjo Posthuma AuthorDate: Fri Jul 22 09:18:52 2022 +0200 Commit: Hiltjo Posthuma CommitDate: Fri Jul 22 09:18:52 2022 +0200 Revert "do not call signal-unsafe function inside sighanlder" This reverts commit 6613d9f9a1a

Re: [hackers] [sbase] [PATCH] Use ar(1)'s s-flag instead of invoking ranlib(1)

I disagree with this change. I think it adds nothing and reduce portability of the Makefiles. Regards,

Re: [hackers] [dwm][PATCH] do not call signal-unsafe function inside sighanlder

Hi, > > Do you have a reference of a description of this behaviour in an other > > system, > > specification or standard? > > > > C89 (7.7.1.1), C99 (7.14.1.1), POSIX 2001 and 2008 all say that "the > equivalent of signal(sig, SIG_DFL)" may be executed prior to executing > the signal handler (b