Re: [hackers][ubase][tput] tput(1)

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:11 PM, wrote: > ...Ed, Sed, Awk... Those are three different tools for more or less the same job. Eclipse can do it already, so we don't need them in sbase. cheers! mar77i

Re: [hackers][ubase][tput] tput(1)

2016-05-22 18:00 GMT-03:00 Lucas Vuotto : > Hello FRIGN, > > the patch is for ubase, not sbase, which, by definitio, is ugly :D > > Anyway, what you say may still hold true. The patch could be smaller if we > only deal with clear, init and reset parameters, as stated by

Re: [hackers][ubase][tput] tput(1)

Hello FRIGN, the patch is for ubase, not sbase, which, by definitio, is ugly :D Anyway, what you say may still hold true. The patch could be smaller if we only deal with clear, init and reset parameters, as stated by POSIX. This come by my mind, but after asking in #suckless, just got an answer

Re: [hackers][ubase][tput] tput(1)

On Sun, 22 May 2016 16:01:43 -0300 Lucas Gabriel Vuotto wrote: Hey Lucas, > attached you will find two patches, one implementing a basic library for > dealing > with terminfo capabilities and another implementing the tput command using > that > library. The library

[hackers][ubase][tput] tput(1)

Hello suckless, attached you will find two patches, one implementing a basic library for dealing with terminfo capabilities and another implementing the tput command using that library. The library itself is part of a bigger library from me, damned [0], for TUI creation. The library is work in