On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 19:30:03 +0600
NRK wrote:
Dear NRK,
> Fair enough. I suppose it should be better fit as a user patch in the
> wiki then?
I personally don't think that this makes sense as a user-patch, given
there's maintenance involved and such a change usually just leads to
failed hunks wh
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 10:28:36AM +0200, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> Thanks for the patch. I'd rather not add another option for it.
>
> I think if the default is not changed it still makes sense. Either way the
> option works as documented.
Fair enough. I suppose it should be better fit as a user
On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 10:28:36 +0200
Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
Dear Hiltjo,
> Thanks for the patch. I'd rather not add another option for it.
>
> I think if the default is not changed it still makes sense. Either
> way the option works as documented.
I understand, it's your call as the maintainer.
On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 11:44:58PM +0600, NRK wrote:
> currently config.h allows users to set the value of topbar to 0.
> however if one does that, there's no way for him to get a topbar again.
> it makes more sense to have -b as a toggle instead.
>
> - NRK
Hi,
Thanks for the patch. I'd rather n
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 23:44:58 +0600
NRK wrote:
Dear NRK,
> currently config.h allows users to set the value of topbar to 0.
> however if one does that, there's no way for him to get a topbar
> again. it makes more sense to have -b as a toggle instead.
this trades one problem for another given dm
currently config.h allows users to set the value of topbar to 0.
however if one does that, there's no way for him to get a topbar again.
it makes more sense to have -b as a toggle instead.
- NRK
>From 064479d53414620e003dd3d143b448b7b8d42311 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NRK
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 20