Hi,
> Yes I most certainly did, this is what I get for submitting patches
> without testing. The shame. New patch attached, also protects against
> the glibc bug causing fgetc to hang after EOF was received.
And what about if we send a patch to glibc instead?
Regards,
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
wrote:
> emg,
>
> Quoth Evan Gates on Thu, Jun 18 2015 14:47 -0700:
>>
>> diff --git a/find.c b/find.c
>> index 186263b..0de1951 100644
>> --- a/find.c
>> +++ b/find.c
>> @@ -415,10 +415,9 @@ pri_ok(struct arg *arg)
>> reply = fgetc(
emg,
Quoth Evan Gates on Thu, Jun 18 2015 14:47 -0700:
diff --git a/find.c b/find.c
index 186263b..0de1951 100644
--- a/find.c
+++ b/find.c
@@ -415,10 +415,9 @@ pri_ok(struct arg *arg)
reply = fgetc(stdin);
/* throw away rest of line */
- while ((c = fgetc(stdin)) != '\n'
As Wolfgang pointed out if the user hit return at the prompt for -ok
another return was needed to continue. This patch fixes that accepting
an empty line as no.
-emg
From 65656d9b2aaf63c518a0e461c373bb7392b5653e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Evan Gates
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 14:43:11 -0700
Subje
